These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28873054)

  • 1. The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time.
    Plavén-Sigray P; Matheson GJ; Schiffler BC; Thompson WH
    Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28873054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators.
    Rakedzon T; Segev E; Chapnik N; Yosef R; Baram-Tsabari A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181742. PubMed ID: 28792945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jargon use in
    Baram-Tsabari A; Wolfson O; Yosef R; Chapnik N; Brill A; Segev E
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Aug; 29(6):644-654. PubMed ID: 32815790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond surface characteristics: a new health text-specific readability measurement.
    Kim H; Goryachev S; Rosemblat G; Browne A; Keselman A; Zeng-Treitler Q
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():418-22. PubMed ID: 18693870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring mumbo jumbo: A preliminary quantification of the use of jargon in science communication.
    Sharon AJ; Baram-Tsabari A
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jul; 23(5):528-46. PubMed ID: 23825277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the readability of lay summaries and scientific abstracts published in CF Research News and the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis: Recommendations for writing lay summaries.
    Anderson HL; Moore JE; Millar BC
    J Cyst Fibros; 2022 Jan; 21(1):e11-e14. PubMed ID: 34600843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Languages for different health information readers: multitrait-multimethod content analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews textual summary formats.
    Karačić J; Dondio P; Buljan I; Hren D; Marušić A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):75. PubMed ID: 30953453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Text characteristics of clinical reports and their implications for the readability of personal health records.
    Zeng-Treitler Q; Kim H; Goryachev S; Keselman A; Slaughter L; Smith CA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1117-21. PubMed ID: 17911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.
    Yeung AWK; Goto TK; Leung WK
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():308. PubMed ID: 30158861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lay abstracts and summaries: writing advice for scientists.
    Dubé CE; Lapane KL
    J Cancer Educ; 2014 Sep; 29(3):577-9. PubMed ID: 24132543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic scientists' conclusions: how readable are they for non-scientist report-users?
    Howes LM; Kirkbride KP; Kelty SF; Julian R; Kemp N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):102-12. PubMed ID: 23890623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.
    Gainey KM; Smith J; McCaffery KJ; Clifford S; Muscat DM
    Patient; 2023 Jan; 16(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 36301440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Easily readable? Examining the readability of lay summaries published in Autism Research.
    Wen J; He S; Yi L
    Autism Res; 2023 May; 16(5):935-940. PubMed ID: 36905091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific abstracts and plain language summaries in psychology: A comparison based on readability indices.
    Stricker J; Chasiotis A; Kerwer M; Günther A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231160. PubMed ID: 32240246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information Quality and Readability: ChatGPT's Responses to the Most Common Questions About Spinal Cord Injury.
    Temel MH; Erden Y; Bağcıer F
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 181():e1138-e1144. PubMed ID: 38000671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].
    Esfahani BJ; Faron A; Roth KS; Schaller HE; Medved F; Lüers JC
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 25412241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The art and science of scientific writing.
    Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Will Podcasting and Social Media Replace Journals and Traditional Science Communication? No, but..
    Fox MP; Carr K; D'Agostino McGowan L; Murray EJ; Hidalgo B; Banack HR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 190(8):1625-1631. PubMed ID: 34089048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability in the British Journal of Surgery.
    Hayden JD
    Br J Surg; 2008 Jan; 95(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 18076017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.