104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28873790)
21. Evaluation of Home Health Care Devices: Remote Usability Assessment.
Kortum P; Peres SC
JMIR Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 2(1):e10. PubMed ID: 27025664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the Functionality and Usability of Two Novel Wheelchair Anti-Rollback Devices for Ramp Ascent in Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.
Deems-Dluhy SL; Jayaraman C; Green S; Albert MV; Jayaraman A
PM R; 2017 May; 9(5):483-493. PubMed ID: 27664403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Usability assessment of ASIBOT: a portable robot to aid patients with spinal cord injury.
Jardón A; Gil ÁM; de la Peña AI; Monje CA; Balaguer C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(4):320-30. PubMed ID: 20969432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Usability evaluation of the SMART application for youth with mTBI.
Dexheimer JW; Kurowski BG; Anders SH; McClanahan N; Wade SL; Babcock L
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():163-170. PubMed ID: 27919376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Longitudinal evaluation of balance quality using a modified bathroom scale: usability and acceptability.
Duchêne J; Hewson DJ
J Telemed Telecare; 2011; 17(8):421-6. PubMed ID: 21979602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring User Experience With 3, 5, 7, or 11 Points : Does It Matter?
Lewis JR
Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 63(6):999-1011. PubMed ID: 31603695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India.
Pal D; Vanijja V
Child Youth Serv Rev; 2020 Dec; 119():105535. PubMed ID: 33020676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Translation into Arabic of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology 2.0 and validation in orthosis users.
Bakhsh H; Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Demers L
Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Dec; 37(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 25305007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Smart Textile Sock System for Athletes' Self-Correction during Functional Tasks: Formative Usability Evaluation.
Semjonova G; Davidovica A; Kozlovskis N; Okss A; Katashevs A
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback System: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Formulift.
O'Reilly MA; Slevin P; Ward T; Caulfield B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Jan; 6(1):e33. PubMed ID: 29386171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Older adults' use of an online decision support system: Usability and stability of assistive technology recommendations.
Auger C; Mortenson WB; Jutai JW; Seguin-Tremblay N; Chenel V; Guay M
Assist Technol; 2022 May; 34(3):316-325. PubMed ID: 32865488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mobile Access to ClinicalConnect: A User Feedback Survey on Usability, Productivity, and Quality.
Eapen BR; Chapman B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2015 Apr; 3(2):e35. PubMed ID: 25877226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usability, Acceptability, and Adherence to an Electronic Self-Monitoring System in Patients With Major Depression Discharged From Inpatient Wards.
Lauritsen L; Andersen L; Olsson E; Søndergaard SR; Nørregaard LB; Løventoft PK; Svendsen SD; Frøkjær E; Jensen HM; Hageman I; Kessing LV; Martiny K
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Apr; 19(4):e123. PubMed ID: 28432040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of the Usability of Sleep Apnea Equipment-Positive Airway Pressure (USE-PAP) questionnaire.
Fung CH; Martin JL; Hays RD; Rodriguez JC; Igodan U; Jouldjian S; Dzierzewski JM; Kramer BJ; Josephson K; Alessi C
Sleep Med; 2015 May; 16(5):645-51. PubMed ID: 25890783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assistive device with conventional, alternative, and brain-computer interface inputs to enhance interaction with the environment for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a feasibility and usability study.
Schettini F; Riccio A; Simione L; Liberati G; Caruso M; Frasca V; Calabrese B; Mecella M; Pizzimenti A; Inghilleri M; Mattia D; Cincotti F
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3 Suppl):S46-53. PubMed ID: 25721547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in The Netherlands.
Demers L; Wessels R; Weiss-Lambrou R; Ska B; De Witte LP
J Rehabil Med; 2001 Jul; 33(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11506218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Verbal and pictorial single-item scales are as good as their 10-item counterparts for measuring perceived usability.
Gräve E; Bell R; Buchner A
Ergonomics; 2024 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Design and usability evaluation of user-centered and visual-based aids for dietary food measurement on mobile devices in a randomized controlled trial.
Liu YC; Chen CH; Lee CW; Lin YS; Chen HY; Yeh JY; Chiu SY
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():122-130. PubMed ID: 27720984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the Greek version of the device subscale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0).
Koumpouros Y; Karavasili A; Papageorgiou E; Siavelis P
Assist Technol; 2016; 28(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 26854178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hybrid P300-based brain-computer interface to improve usability for people with severe motor disability: electromyographic signals for error correction during a spelling task.
Riccio A; Holz EM; Aricò P; Leotta F; Aloise F; Desideri L; Rimondini M; Kübler A; Mattia D; Cincotti F
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3 Suppl):S54-61. PubMed ID: 25721548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
