These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28873825)

  • 1. Exploring the Perspectives of People Who Use Alternative and Augmentative Communication Aids (AAC).
    Broomfield K; Sage K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():370-373. PubMed ID: 28873825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).
    Broomfield K; Harrop D; Jones GL; Sage K; Judge S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 19(5):1802-1816. PubMed ID: 36026563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review.
    Broomfield K; Harrop D; Judge S; Jones G; Sage K
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Oct; 28(10):2669-2683. PubMed ID: 31214931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using longitudinal qualitative research to explore the experience of receiving and using augmentative and alternative communication.
    Broomfield K; Judge S; Sage K; Jones GL; James D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024; 59(3):1043-1065. PubMed ID: 37962244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring communication assistants as an option for increasing communication access to communities for people who use augmentative communication.
    Collier B; McGhie-Richmond D; Self H
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Mar; 26(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 20196704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
    Judge S; Townend G
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A call for innovative social media research in the field of augmentative and alternative communication.
    Hemsley B; Balandin S; Palmer S; Dann S
    Augment Altern Commun; 2017 Mar; 33(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 28121173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making a voice heard: evaluation of a new service delivery in augmentative and alternative communication through qualitative interviews with people without natural speech.
    Zinkevich A; Uthoff SAK; Boenisch J; Sachse SK; Schnack H; Garbe C; Bernasconi T; Ansmann L
    BMC Res Notes; 2023 Mar; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 36991499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.
    McCall F; Marková I; Murphy J; Moodie E; Collins S
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(3 Spec No):235-56. PubMed ID: 9474291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canadian manufacturer and technician perspectives on the design and use of augmentative and alternative communication technology.
    Bonar S; Burnham S; Henderson J; Batorowicz B; Pinder SD; Shepherd T; Davies TC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 19(5):1871-1878. PubMed ID: 37528746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The complexities of AAC intervention research: emerging trends to consider.
    Romski M; Sevcik RA
    Augment Altern Commun; 2018 Dec; 34(4):258-264. PubMed ID: 30369269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: determining the need.
    Creer S; Enderby P; Judge S; John A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Nov; 51(6):639-653. PubMed ID: 27113569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention.
    Light J; McNaughton D
    Augment Altern Commun; 2013 Dec; 29(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 24229334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What communication strategies do AAC users want their communication partners to use? A preliminary study.
    Midtlin HS; Næss KA; Taxt T; Karlsen AV
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(14):1260-7. PubMed ID: 25243768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the Role of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Aphasia Rehabilitation.
    Dietz A; Wallace SE; Weissling K
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 May; 29(2):909-913. PubMed ID: 32109137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Augmentative and alternative communication: past, present and future.
    Alm N; Parnes P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1995; 47(3):165-92. PubMed ID: 7640721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey on the awareness, accessibility and funding for augmentative and alternative communication services and devices in Saudi Arabia.
    Alsari NAM; Alshair AM; Almalik SA; Alsa'ad SS
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Oct; 16(7):789-795. PubMed ID: 32207350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) care in Germany: a study protocol of an evaluation study with a controlled mixed-methods design.
    Zinkevich A; Uthoff SAK; Boenisch J; Sachse SK; Bernasconi T; Ansmann L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029469. PubMed ID: 31467052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in critical care settings: Perspectives of healthcare professionals.
    Handberg C; Voss AK
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jan; 27(1-2):102-114. PubMed ID: 28401613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Culturally and linguistically diverse student and family perspectives of AAC.
    Kulkarni SS; Parmar J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2017 Sep; 33(3):170-180. PubMed ID: 28697629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.