These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28873880)

  • 1. A Review of Physical Activity Monitoring and Activity Trackers for Older Adults.
    Barton J; O'Flynn B; Tedesco S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():748-754. PubMed ID: 28873880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Review of Activity Trackers for Senior Citizens: Research Perspectives, Commercial Landscape and the Role of the Insurance Industry.
    Tedesco S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28587188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.
    Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.
    Alharbi M; Straiton N; Smith S; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
    Maturitas; 2019 Jun; 124():100-110. PubMed ID: 30910279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.
    Kononova A; Li L; Kamp K; Bowen M; Rikard RV; Cotten S; Peng W
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e9832. PubMed ID: 30950807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care.
    Alharbi M; Straiton N; Gallagher R
    Curr Heart Fail Rep; 2017 Feb; 14(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 28181075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
    An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Are Wearable Activity Trackers Adopted in Older Adults? Comparison between Subjective Adoption Attitudes and Physical Activity Performance.
    Lee BC; Xie J; Ajisafe T; Kim SH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32429258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
    Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of wearable fitness devices.
    Kaewkannate K; Kim S
    BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of Wearable Trackers on Physical Activity in Healthy Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Tang MSS; Moore K; McGavigan A; Clark RA; Ganesan AN
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e15576. PubMed ID: 32706685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review.
    Straiton N; Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gullick J; Bhindi R; Gallagher R
    Maturitas; 2018 Jun; 112():85-93. PubMed ID: 29704922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Users' experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study.
    Maher C; Ryan J; Ambrosi C; Edney S
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):880. PubMed ID: 29141607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of wearable physical activity trackers in people with Parkinson's disease.
    Lamont RM; Daniel HL; Payne CL; Brauer SG
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():104-108. PubMed ID: 29729611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Exploration and Confirmation of the Factors Influencing Adoption of IoT-Based Wearable Fitness Trackers.
    Kao YS; Nawata K; Huang CY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(18):. PubMed ID: 31487812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavior Change Techniques Present in Wearable Activity Trackers: A Critical Analysis.
    Mercer K; Li M; Giangregorio L; Burns C; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Apr; 4(2):e40. PubMed ID: 27122452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User Acceptance of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Method Study.
    Puri A; Kim B; Nguyen O; Stolee P; Tung J; Lee J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Nov; 5(11):e173. PubMed ID: 29141837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
    Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC
    Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Social Networkout": Connecting Social Features of Wearable Fitness Trackers with Physical Exercise.
    Zhu Y; Dailey SL; Kreitzberg D; Bernhardt J
    J Health Commun; 2017 Dec; 22(12):974-980. PubMed ID: 29173072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of wearable motion sensing technology on physical activity in older adults.
    Cooper C; Gross A; Brinkman C; Pope R; Allen K; Hastings S; Bogen BE; Goode AP
    Exp Gerontol; 2018 Oct; 112():9-19. PubMed ID: 30103025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.