These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2887396)

  • 1. The significance of differences between means. A simulation study.
    McArdle BH
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1987; 87(4):979-82. PubMed ID: 2887396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An extension of Satterthwaite's approximation applied to pharmacokinetics.
    Nedelman JR; Jia X
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 May; 8(2):317-28. PubMed ID: 9598425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More on the means comparison with unequal variances problem.
    Ames MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 May; 6(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 8732912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solutions to the Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Reed JF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Mar; 70(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 12581558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidelines for statistical analysis of percentage of syllables stuttered data.
    Jones M; Onslow M; Packman A; Gebski V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 16908881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comments on Nedelman and Jia's extension of Satterthwaite's approximation applied to pharmacokinetics.
    Holder DJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):75-9. PubMed ID: 11459444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The significance of differences between means. An empirical study.
    Scheer BT
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1986; 83(3):405-8. PubMed ID: 2870842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A COMPARISON OF POWER APPROXIMATIONS FOR SATTERTHWAITE'S TEST.
    Disantostefano RL; Muller KE
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 1995; 24(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 24078764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA fingerprinting data and the analysis of population genetic structure by comparing band-sharing patterns.
    Bertorelle G; Bucchini L; Pilastro A; Matessi C
    Mol Ecol; 1999 Nov; 8(11):1851-66. PubMed ID: 10620229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On using an approximate noncentral t-distribution in determining a one-side upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(2):575-81. PubMed ID: 17474527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An approach for sample size determination of average bioequivalence based on interval estimation.
    Chiang C; Hsiao CF
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1068-1082. PubMed ID: 28070984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional logistic regression with sandwich estimators: application to a meta-analysis.
    Fay MP; Graubard BI; Freedman LS; Midthune DN
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):195-208. PubMed ID: 9544516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biometry has to improve the quality of decision making both in biomedical research and in clinical practice.
    Mikulecky M
    Acta Physiol Hung; 1988; 72(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 3421129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference of two dependent sensitivities and specificities: Comparison of various approaches.
    Wenzel D; Zapf A
    Biom J; 2013 Sep; 55(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 23828661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A PRACTICAL AND SIMPLE EQUIVALENT FOR STUDENT'S T TEST OF STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE.
    HOGBEN CA
    J Lab Clin Med; 1964 Nov; 64():815-9. PubMed ID: 14231147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overview of biostatistics used in clinical research.
    De Muth JE
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 19106347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.