202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28874304)
1. Effect of Cricoid Pressure on the Insertion Efficacy of Six Supraglottic Devices: A Crossover Randomized Simulation Trial.
Ohchi F; Komasawa N; Mihara R; Hattori K; Minami T
J Emerg Med; 2017 Nov; 53(5):635-641. PubMed ID: 28874304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the efficacy of six supraglottic devices for airway management in dark conditions: a crossover randomized simulation trial.
Ohchi F; Komasawa N; Imagawa K; Okamoto K; Minami T
J Anesth; 2015 Dec; 29(6):887-92. PubMed ID: 26206177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of chest compression effect on airway management with air-Q, aura-i, i-gel, and Fastrack intubating supraglottic devices by novice physicians: a randomized crossover simulation study.
Komasawa N; Ueki R; Kaminoh Y; Nishi S
J Anesth; 2014 Oct; 28(5):676-80. PubMed ID: 24563178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the i-gel and classic LMA insertion in manikins by experienced and novice physicians.
Stroumpoulis K; Isaia C; Bassiakou E; Pantazopoulos I; Troupis G; Mazarakis A; Demestiha T; Xanthos T
Eur J Emerg Med; 2012 Feb; 19(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 21593672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of air-Q(®) and Soft Seal(®) laryngeal mask for airway management by novice doctors during infant chest compression: a manikin study.
Komasawa N; Ueki R; Yamamoto N; Atagi K; Nishi S; Kaminoh Y; Tashiro C
Resuscitation; 2012 Mar; 83(3):365-8. PubMed ID: 21958927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients.
Li CW; Xue FS; Xu YC; Liu Y; Mao P; Liu KP; Yang QY; Zhang GH; Sun HT
Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1195-8, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LMA-ProSeal insertion by novice doctors as affected by a 90° bend created by an intubating stylet: a randomized clinical trial.
Ishio J; Komasawa N; Miyazaki Y; Kido H; Minami T
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():145-50. PubMed ID: 27687362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Supreme(®) and Soft Seal(®) laryngeal masks for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in novice doctors: a manikin study.
Kohama H; Komasawa N; Ueki R; Samma A; Nakagawa M; Nishi S; Kaminoh Y
J Anesth; 2011 Feb; 25(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 21120542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the i-gel and other supraglottic airways in adult manikin studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
An J; Nam SB; Lee JS; Lee J; Yoo H; Lee HM; Kim MS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(1):e5801. PubMed ID: 28072732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of five 2nd-generation supraglottic airway devices for airway management performed by novice military operators.
Henlin T; Sotak M; Kovaricek P; Tyll T; Balcarek L; Michalek P
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():201898. PubMed ID: 26495289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulation analysis of three intubating supraglottic devices during infant chest compression.
Kohama H; Komasawa N; Ueki R; Kaminoh Y; Nishi S
Pediatr Int; 2015; 57(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 25711262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices--a manikin study.
Ruetzler K; Roessler B; Potura L; Priemayr A; Robak O; Schuster E; Frass M
Resuscitation; 2011 May; 82(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 21353364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial.
Bielski A; Rivas E; Ruetzler K; Smereka J; Puslecki M; Dabrowski M; Ladny JR; Frass M; Robak O; Evrin T; Szarpak L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593. PubMed ID: 30290627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Air-Q
Portas M; Canal MI; Barrio M; Alonso M; Cabrerizo P; López-Gil M; Zaballos M
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 65(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 29217156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of blind intubation through the I-gel and the Air-Q™ by novice physicians during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, crossover, manikin trial.
Szarpak Ł
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Mar; 35(3):509-510. PubMed ID: 27865574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices.
Jackson KM; Cook TM
Anaesthesia; 2007 Apr; 62(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 17381577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of first and second generation supraglottic airway devices in patients with simulated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.
Yildiz E; Saracoglu K; Saracoglu A; Sorbello M; Kizilay D; Kafali H
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2019; 51(5):373-379. PubMed ID: 31893603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cricoid pressure prevents placement of the laryngeal tube and laryngeal tube-suction II.
Asai T; Goy RW; Liu EH
Br J Anaesth; 2007 Aug; 99(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 17573388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients.
Howes BW; Wharton NM; Gibbison B; Cook TM
Anaesthesia; 2010 Apr; 65(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 20180796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
