These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 288744)
41. Treatments with saline solutions and DNase I have different effects on DNA content and distribution in human and in mouse chromosomes. Bottone MG; Malgara R; Pellicciari C; Fuhrman Conti AM Eur J Histochem; 1996; 40(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 8839703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Automating Giemsa banding of chromosomes: protocol for and evaluation of the use of a programmable, high-throughput automatic stainer. Gregory C; Maher E Biotech Histochem; 2009 Dec; 84(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 19384744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Structure of human chromosomes visualized at the electron microscopic level. Hozier JC; Furcht LT; Wendelshafer-Grabb G Chromosoma; 1981; 82(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 7261711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. In situ nick translation of human chromosomes with the restriction endonuclease Pvu II [5' CAG decreases CTG 3']. Mathews T; Agarwal AK; Verma RS Cytobios; 1994; 78(315):249-53. PubMed ID: 8001401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. mBAND: a high resolution multicolor banding technique for the detection of complex intrachromosomal aberrations. Chudoba I; Hickmann G; Friedrich T; Jauch A; Kozlowski P; Senger G Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):390-3. PubMed ID: 15162070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. High-resolution R-banding at the 1250-band level. III. Comparative analysis of morphologic and dynamic R-band patterns (RHG and RBG). Drouin R; Lemieux N; Richer CL Hereditas; 1991; 114(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 2071451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A pepsin-revealed material possibly related to chromosomal banding. Byarugaba W Chromosoma; 1978 Jul; 67(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 359279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Some factors affecting the action of restriction endonucleases on human metaphase chromosomes. Mezzanotte R; Ferrucci L; Vanni R; Sumner AT Exp Cell Res; 1985 Nov; 161(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 2414120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quantitative analysis of high-resolution trypsin-giemsa bands on human prometaphase chromosomes. Francke U; Oliver N Hum Genet; 1978 Dec; 45(2):137-65. PubMed ID: 738718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Gene density in the Giemsa bands of human chromosomes. Federico C; Andreozzi L; Saccone S; Bernardi G Chromosome Res; 2000; 8(8):737-46. PubMed ID: 11196136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Characterization of human heteroploid cell line J-111: Reverse banding patterns of marker chromosomes. Verma RS; Dosik H; Lavappa KS J Hered; 1977; 68(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 599280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. First chromosome data on Steindachneridion scripta (Pisces, Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from Brazilian rivers: Giemsa, CBG, G-, and RE banding. Swarça AC; Fenocchio AS; Cestari MM; Dias AL Genet Mol Res; 2005 Dec; 4(4):734-41. PubMed ID: 16475119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A simple reliable procedure for obtaining metaphases from human leukemic bone-marrow aspirates suitable for Giemsa banding. Srivastava AK; Smith RD In Vitro; 1980 Feb; 16(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 6988325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cytogenetic research techniques in humans and laboratory animals that can be applied most profitably to livestock. Pathak S J Dairy Sci; 1979 May; 62(5):836-43. PubMed ID: 379064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An atomic force microscope for cytological and histological investigations. Mariani T; Musio A; Frediani C; Sbrana I; Ascoli C J Microsc; 1994 Nov; 176(Pt 2):121-31. PubMed ID: 7531771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. High-resolution ideograms of trypsin-Giemsa banded human chromosomes. Francke U Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1981; 31(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 7297127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]