873 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28874642)
1. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations in crestal cortical bone thickness at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone.
Ko YC; Huang HL; Shen YW; Cai JY; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28074591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Male Patient's Age Affect the Cortical Bone Thickness of Jawbone for Dental Implant Placement? A Cohort Study.
Wang SH; Ko YC; Tsai MT; Fuh LJ; Huang HL; Shen YW; Hsu JT
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33919492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between the thickness of the crestal and buccolingual cortical bone at varying depths and implant stability quotients.
Chatvaratthana K; Thaworanunta S; Seriwatanachai D; Wongsirichat N
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0190293. PubMed ID: 29281715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between Cortical Bone Thickness and Cancellous Bone Density at Dental Implant Sites in the Jawbone.
Wang SH; Shen YW; Fuh LJ; Peng SL; Tsai MT; Huang HL; Hsu JT
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32957724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Evaluation of Bone-Related Factors at the Implant Site by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Vasegh Z; Safi Y; Amid R; Ahsaie MG; Amiri MJ; Minooei Z
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 35377992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between Age of Menopause and Thickness of Crestal Cortical Bone at Dental Implant Site: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
Ko YC; Tsai MT; Fuh LJ; Tsai MJ; Wang XH; Huang HL; Hsu JT
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32823531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal sites for mini-implant insertion in the lingual or palatal alveolar cortical bone as assessed by cone beam computed tomography in South Indian population.
Mallick S; Murali PS; Kuttappa MN; Shetty P; Nair A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 32749047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A CBCT atlas of buccal cortical bone thickness in interradicular spaces.
Holmes PB; Wolf BJ; Zhou J
Angle Orthod; 2015 Nov; 85(6):911-9. PubMed ID: 25760885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CBCT analysis of crestal soft tissue thickness before implant placement and its relationship with cortical bone thickness.
Cui X; Reason T; Pardi V; Wu Q; Martinez Luna AA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):593. PubMed ID: 36496410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of anatomical structures and variations in the maxilla and the mandible before dental implant treatment.
Genç T; Duruel O; Kutlu HB; Dursun E; Karabulut E; Tözüm TF
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 30328299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessments of jaw bone density at implant sites using 3D cone-beam computed tomography.
Hao Y; Zhao W; Wang Y; Yu J; Zou D
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 24867520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.
Sur J; Seki K; Koizumi H; Nakajima K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.
Sadek MM; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 27667817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
