240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28874994)
1. Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.
Siadat H; Beyabanaki E; Mousavi N; Alikhasi M
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 28874994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments.
Alikhasi M; Monzavi A; Bassir SH; Naini RB; Khosronedjad N; Keshavarz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 23869357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.
Bédouin Y; Lefrançois E; Salomon JP; Auroy P
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 34238536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical properties and marginal fit of prefabricated versus customized dental implant abutments: A comparative study.
Ma M; Li X; Zou L; He J; Zhao B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):720-729. PubMed ID: 36043699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fracture resistance and fit accuracy of customized zirconia abutments with prefabricated zirconia abutments in internal hexagonal implants.
Park JI; Lee Y; Lee JH; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 22236163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level prosthetic components used in conventional and digital workflows.
Rutkūnas V; Bilius V; Dirsė J; Revilla-León M; Rimašauskas M; Zadrożny Ł; Trumpaitė-Vanagienė R
J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104835. PubMed ID: 38224850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments for Microleakage.
Abdelhamed MI; Galley JD; Bailey MT; Johnston WM; Holloway J; McGlumphy E; Leblebicioglu B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e643-51. PubMed ID: 25726941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An
Sutradhar W; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 36511051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Displacement comparison of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments to implants with different conical connections.
Yilmaz B; Hashemzadeh S; Seidt JD; Clelland NL
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):200-203. PubMed ID: 28888428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different abutment material and surgical insertion torque on the marginal adaptation of an internal conical interface: an in vitro study.
Farronato D; Pieroni S; Mangano FG; Briguglio F; Re D
J Prosthodont Res; 2014 Oct; 58(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 24986370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Sealing Capability of the Internal Conical Connections of Implants with Titanium and Zirconia Abutments.
Black DL; Turkyilmaz I; Lien W; Chong CH
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):915-922. PubMed ID: 28989130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
