239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28874994)
21. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.
Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of Implant Connection, Abutment Design and Screw Insertion Torque on Implant-Abutment Misfit.
Vélez J; Peláez J; López-Suárez C; Agustín-Panadero R; Tobar C; Suárez MJ
J Clin Med; 2020 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32722131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sealing capability and marginal fit of titanium versus zirconia abutments with different connection designs.
Şen N; Şermet IB; Gürler N
J Adv Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 11(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 31080571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Titanium and Zirconia External Connection Abutments Produced Following a Digital Protocol: An In Vitro Study.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Zaccaria M; Mutinelli S
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(4):358-360. PubMed ID: 31283815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Wear of Titanium Implant Platforms with Different Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A Pilot Study.
Mendes TA; Vilhena L; Portugal J; Caramês J; Ramalho AL; Lopes LP
J Funct Biomater; 2023 Mar; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 37103268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Precision of the Connection Between Implant and Standard or Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Abutments: A Novel Evaluation Method.
Lops D; Meneghello R; Sbricoli L; Savio G; Bressan E; Stellini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 29340342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Abutment removal torque and implant conical surface morphological changes after standardized artificial aging: An in vitro study.
Zhai Z; Nakano T; Chen Y; Watanabe S; Matsuoka T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36528391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments.
Siadat H; Belbasi S; Alikhasi M; Nazari V; Beyabanaki E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e661-e665. PubMed ID: 29239053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Axial displacement in cement-retained prostheses with different implant-abutment connections.
Ko KH; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1098–1104. PubMed ID: 30934038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Dimensional Deformation and Wear of Internal Implant-Abutment Connection: A Comparative Biomechanical Study Using Titanium and Zirconia.
Nam RK; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Kwon HB; Yoon HI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 30427958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of fatigue loading on the screw joint stability of zirconium abutment.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Kano T; Sasaki K
J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Jul; 57(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 23796911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
