302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28875594)
1. Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization.
Qiu J; Harold Li H; Zhang T; Ma F; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):218-223. PubMed ID: 28875594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancement of megavoltage electronic portal images for markerless tumor tracking.
Cheong KH; Yoon JW; Park S; Hwang T; Kang SK; Koo T; Han TJ; Kim H; Lee MY; Kim KJ; Bae H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):398-406. PubMed ID: 29984883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of x-ray and CT image enhancements on the robustness and accuracy of a rigid 3D/2D image registration.
Kim J; Yin FF; Zhao Y; Kim JH
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 15895569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of patient setup errors with a portal image - DRR registration software application.
Sutherland K; Ishikawa M; Bengua G; Ito YM; Miyamoto Y; Shirato H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 12(3):3492. PubMed ID: 21844862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of off-line image processing for optimization in chest computed radiography using a low cost system.
Muhogora WE; Msaki P; Padovani R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):4774. PubMed ID: 26103165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated 2D-3D registration of portal images and CT data using line-segment enhancement.
Munbodh R; Chen Z; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Knisely JP; Duncan JS
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4352-61. PubMed ID: 18975681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An adaptive enhancement method for breast X-ray images based on the nonsubsampled contourlet transform domain and whale optimization algorithm.
Zhang CJ; Nie HH
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Oct; 57(10):2245-2263. PubMed ID: 31410690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing dual-energy x-ray parameters for the ExacTrac clinical stereoscopic imaging system to enhance soft-tissue imaging.
Bowman WA; Robar JL; Sattarivand M
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):823-831. PubMed ID: 28060412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening.
Ohkubo M; Wada S; Kayugawa A; Matsumoto T; Murao K
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):3915-23. PubMed ID: 21858988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A psychophysical comparison of two methods for adaptive histogram equalization.
Zimmerman JB; Cousins SB; Hartzell KM; Frisse ME; Kahn MG
J Digit Imaging; 1989 May; 2(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2488161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chest CT window settings with multiscale adaptive histogram equalization: pilot study.
Fayad LM; Jin Y; Laine AF; Berkmen YM; Pearson GD; Freedman B; Van Heertum R
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):845-52. PubMed ID: 12034958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Mathematical Morphology-Based Filter for Noise Reduction and Detail Preservation in Low-Dose Dental CT Images.
Stringhini RM; Welfer D; d'Ornellas MC; Gamarra DFT
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():253-257. PubMed ID: 31437924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive fast marching method for automatic liver segmentation from CT images.
Song X; Cheng M; Wang B; Huang S; Huang X; Yang J
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091917. PubMed ID: 24007168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast, accurate, and robust automatic marker detection for motion correction based on oblique kV or MV projection image pairs.
Slagmolen P; Hermans J; Maes F; Budiharto T; Haustermans K; van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1554-64. PubMed ID: 20443476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
