These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28876210)
21. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology. Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Plant Disease Severity Assessment-How Rater Bias, Assessment Method, and Experimental Design Affect Hypothesis Testing and Resource Use Efficiency. Chiang KS; Bock CH; Lee IH; El Jarroudi M; Delfosse P Phytopathology; 2016 Dec; 106(12):1451-1464. PubMed ID: 27532427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly? Maggard MA; O'Connell JB; Liu JH; Etzioni DA; Ko CY Surgery; 2003 Aug; 134(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 12947329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A shift from significance test to hypothesis test through power analysis in medical research. Singh G J Postgrad Med; 2006; 52(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 16679686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size. Lazic SE Lab Anim; 2018 Dec; 52(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 29629616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The experimental design of postmortem studies: the effect size and statistical power. Meurs J Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2016 Sep; 12(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 27412160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Type II (beta) errors in the hand literature: the importance of power. Chung KC; Kalliainen LK; Hayward RA J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 9523949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [A Review on the Use of Effect Size in Nursing Research]. Kang H; Yeon K; Han ST J Korean Acad Nurs; 2015 Oct; 45(5):641-9. PubMed ID: 26582109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students. Taylor S; Muncer S Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The reassessment of trial perspectives from interim data--a critical view. Bauer P; Koenig F Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16220517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Analysis and importance of statistical power and sample size in empirical scientific research]. Klimek KM Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):211-5. PubMed ID: 19172834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem. Smith RJ Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference. Bradley MT; Brand A Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 24245076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [What to do if statistical power is low? A practical strategy for pre-post-designs]. Müller J; Manz R; Hoyer J Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2002; 52(9-10):408-16. PubMed ID: 12355348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Schönbrodt FD; Wagenmakers EJ; Zehetleitner M; Perugini M Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):322-339. PubMed ID: 26651986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research. Kinney AR; Eakman AM; Graham JE Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 101(12):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 32272106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]