These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28877169)

  • 1. Sleep and eyewitness memory: Fewer false identifications after sleep when the target is absent from the lineup.
    Stepan ME; Dehnke TM; Fenn KM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0182907. PubMed ID: 28877169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications.
    Charman SD; Quiroz V
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 27227276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are multiple-trial experiments appropriate for eyewitness identification studies? Accuracy, choosing, and confidence across trials.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Lindsay RCL
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2235-2254. PubMed ID: 28432569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eyewitness memory in the news can affect the strategic regulation of memory reporting.
    Butt MM; Colloff MF; Magner E; Flowe HD
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):763-774. PubMed ID: 33258419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.
    Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images.
    Thompson WB; Johnson J
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
    Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The grain-size lineup: A test of a novel eyewitness identification procedure.
    Horry R; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 26595704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.
    Baldassari MJ; Moore KN; Hyman IE; Hope L; Mah EY; Lindsay DS; Mansour J; Saraiva R; Horry R; Rath H; Kelly L; Jones R; Vale S; Lawson B; Pedretti J; Palma TA; Cruz F; Quarenta J; Van der Cruyssen I; Mileva M; Allen J; Jeye B; Wiechert S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Feb; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 36854842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regularities in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perpetrator pose reinstatement during a lineup test increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Seale-Carlisle TM; Karoğlu N; Rockey JC; Smith HMJ; Smith L; Maltby J; Yaremenko S; Flowe HD
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13830. PubMed ID: 34244529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help?
    Memon A; Gabbert F
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12731718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.