These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28877666)

  • 1. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
    Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.
    Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
    Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative efficiency of joint-model and full-conditional-specification multiple imputation when conditional models are compatible: The general location model.
    Seaman SR; Hughes RA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1603-1614. PubMed ID: 27597798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
    Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation for missing data: fully conditional specification versus multivariate normal imputation.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(5):624-32. PubMed ID: 20106935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
    Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Multiple Imputation with GEE with Non-monotone Missing Longitudinal Binary Outcomes.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Weiss RD
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):890-904. PubMed ID: 33006740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.
    van Buuren S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Jun; 16(3):219-42. PubMed ID: 17621469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple imputation in the presence of an incomplete binary variable created from an underlying continuous variable.
    Grobler AC; Lee K
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):467-478. PubMed ID: 31304611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of random-forest-based imputation of missing data in the presence of non-normality, non-linearity, and interaction.
    Hong S; Lynn HS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):199. PubMed ID: 32711455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-parametric approach for frequentist multiple imputation in survival analysis with missing covariates.
    Takeuchi Y; Ogawa M; Hagiwara Y; Matsuyama Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1691-1707. PubMed ID: 34110942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doubly robust and multiple-imputation-based generalized estimating equations.
    Birhanu T; Molenberghs G; Sotto C; Kenward MG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Mar; 21(2):202-25. PubMed ID: 21390997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple imputation of missing data under missing at random: compatible imputation models are not sufficient to avoid bias if they are mis-specified.
    Curnow E; Carpenter JR; Heron JE; Cornish RP; Rach S; Didelez V; Langeheine M; Tilling K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 160():100-109. PubMed ID: 37343895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review and evaluation of imputation methods for multivariate longitudinal data with mixed-type incomplete variables.
    Cao Y; Allore H; Vander Wyk B; Gutman R
    Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(30):5844-5876. PubMed ID: 36220138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation for non-response when estimating HIV prevalence using survey data.
    Chinomona A; Mwambi H
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Oct; 15():1059. PubMed ID: 26475303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.