These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28877742)

  • 1. A comparative study of the impacts of unbalanced sample sizes on the four synthesized methods of meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Alamolhoda M; Ayatollahi SMT; Bagheri Z
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Sep; 10(1):446. PubMed ID: 28877742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations.
    Cheung MW; Cheung SF
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):140-55. PubMed ID: 27286900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing moderator hypotheses in meta-analytic structural equation modeling using subgroup analysis.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1359-1373. PubMed ID: 29869223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for Missing Correlation Coefficients in Fixed-Effects MASEM.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 29220593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The problem of effect size heterogeneity in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Yu JJ; Downes PE; Carter KM; O'Boyle EH
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Oct; 101(10):1457-1473. PubMed ID: 27504654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues in solving the problem of effect size heterogeneity in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A commentary and simulation study on Yu, Downes, Carter, and O'Boyle (2016).
    Cheung MW
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Jul; 103(7):787-803. PubMed ID: 29985024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one-stage MASEM.
    Jak S; Li H; Kolbe L; de Jonge H; Cheung MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):590-606. PubMed ID: 34043279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach.
    Cheung MW; Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Mar; 10(1):40-64. PubMed ID: 15810868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: examples and analyses in R.
    Cheung MW
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 23807765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A tutorial on the meta-analytic structural equation modeling of reliability coefficients.
    Scherer R; Teo T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):747-775. PubMed ID: 32134314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
    van Zundert CHJ; Miočević M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):849-865. PubMed ID: 32833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computing Multivariate Effect Sizes and Their Sampling Covariance Matrices With Structural Equation Modeling: Theory, Examples, and Computer Simulations.
    Cheung MW
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1387. PubMed ID: 30174628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Fixed-Effects and Random-Effects Models for Multivariate Meta-Analysis Using an SEM Approach.
    Cai Z; Fan X
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):839-854. PubMed ID: 31726881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applying meta-analysis to structural equation modeling.
    Hedges LV
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 27286904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in multicenter trials with unequal sample sizes within and among centers.
    Bagheri Z; Ayatollahi SM; Jafari P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():58. PubMed ID: 21518458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis.
    Thompson CG; Becker BJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 26052849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets.
    Wilson SJ; Polanin JR; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):121-39. PubMed ID: 27286899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.