These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28878256)

  • 21. Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs.
    Zhang X; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Semagn K; Beyene Y; Babu R; López-Cruz MA; San Vicente F; Olsen M; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Prasanna BM; Crossa J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 114(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 25407079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction.
    Bandeira E Sousa M; Cuevas J; de Oliveira Couto EG; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Jarquín D; Fritsche-Neto R; Burgueño J; Crossa J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1995-2014. PubMed ID: 28455415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
    Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Technical note: Equivalent genomic models with a residual polygenic effect.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2016-2025. PubMed ID: 26723117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Method to represent the distribution of QTL additive and dominance effects associated with quantitative traits in computer simulation.
    Sun X; Mumm RH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26852240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accurate and Scalable Construction of Polygenic Scores in Large Biobank Data Sets.
    Yang S; Zhou X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 May; 106(5):679-693. PubMed ID: 32330416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
    Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.
    Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4646-56. PubMed ID: 22818479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mapping the genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations.
    Yang J; Zhu J; Williams RW
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(12):1527-36. PubMed ID: 17459962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of biological priors enhances understanding of genetic architecture and genomic prediction of complex traits within and between dairy cattle breeds.
    Fang L; Sahana G; Ma P; Su G; Yu Y; Zhang S; Lund MS; Sørensen P
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):604. PubMed ID: 28797230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.
    Schopp P; Riedelsheimer C; Utz HF; Schön CC; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Nov; 128(11):2189-201. PubMed ID: 26231985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From Genotype to Phenotype: Polygenic Prediction of Complex Human Traits.
    Raben TG; Lello L; Widen E; Hsu SDH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2467():421-446. PubMed ID: 35451785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer.
    Covarrubias-Pazaran G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156744. PubMed ID: 27271781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Bayesian Genomic Regression Model with Skew Normal Random Errors.
    Pérez-Rodríguez P; Acosta-Pech R; Pérez-Elizalde S; Cruz CV; Espinosa JS; Crossa J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1771-1785. PubMed ID: 29588381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.