121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28879102)
1. Performance of the Cellslide
Michelow P; Sherrin A; Rossouw L; Mohaleamolla S; Evans D; Swarts A; Rakhombe N; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
Afr J Lab Med; 2016; 5(1):278. PubMed ID: 28879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples.
Singh VB; Gupta N; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Suri V; Rajwanshi A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening: An Experience From Pakistan.
Hashmi AA; Naz S; Ahmed O; Yaqeen SR; Irfan M; Asif MG; Kamal A; Faridi N
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12293. PubMed ID: 33520497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study.
Gupta R; Yadav R; Sharda A; Kumar D; Sandeep ; Mehrotra R; Gupta S
Cytojournal; 2019; 16():22. PubMed ID: 31803248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases.
Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S
J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of PAP smear and liquid based cytology as a screening method for cervical carcinoma.
Khakwani M; Parveen R; Azhar M
Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1827-1831. PubMed ID: 36246719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of bizarre cells in cervical screening liquid-based cytology: A prospective study of 15 cases.
Ondič O; Ferko R; Kičinová J; Bouda J; Kinkorová-Luňáčková I; Kupcová L; Zůchová M; Chytra J; Waloschek T; Tůmová Bartošková M; Alaghehbandan R; Němcová J
Cytopathology; 2018 Feb; 29(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29154448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the conventional cervical smear and liquid-based cytology: results of a controlled, prospective study in the Abruzzo Region of Italy.
Maccallini V; Angeloni C; Caraceni D; Fortunato C; Venditti MA; Di Gabriele G; Antonelli C; Lattanzi A; Puliti D; Ciatto S; Confortini M; Sani C; Zappa M
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 18833819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Study of Pap Smears in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Women from a Tertiary Care Center in South India.
Gupta K; Philipose CS; Rai S; Ramapuram J; Kaur G; Kini H; Gv C; Adiga D
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 30721904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears.
Mahajan S; Rajwanshi A; Srinivasan R; Radotra BD; Panda N
J Cytol; 2021; 38(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 35002112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liquid-based versus conventional cytology in solid pediatric neoplasm: Comparison of their diagnostic and morphological spectra.
Agarwal P; Yadav S; Kumar A; Goel MM
J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 28028334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsatisfactory rate in liquid-based cervical samples as compared to conventional smears: A study from tertiary care hospital.
Gupta N; Bhar VS; Rajwanshi A; Suri V
Cytojournal; 2016; 13():14. PubMed ID: 27382408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical study on primary screening of oral cancer and precancerous lesions by oral cytology.
Sukegawa S; Ono S; Nakano K; Takabatake K; Kawai H; Nagatsuka H; Furuki Y
Diagn Pathol; 2020 Sep; 15(1):107. PubMed ID: 32912249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Efficiency of Cervical Pap and Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology: A Review.
Dasgupta S
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48343. PubMed ID: 38060751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
