These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28879495)

  • 1. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantum Cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():749-778. PubMed ID: 34546804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primer on quantum cognition.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E53. PubMed ID: 31868156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantum probability framework for human probabilistic inference.
    Trueblood JS; Yearsley JM; Pothos EM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Sep; 146(9):1307-1341. PubMed ID: 28682091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments.
    Wang Z; Solloway T; Shiffrin RM; Busemeyer JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9431-6. PubMed ID: 24979797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z; Pothos EM; Trueblood JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 25621376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a problem with quantum models of psychological measurements?
    Busemeyer J; Wang Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187733. PubMed ID: 29117246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives on Correctness in Probabilistic Inference from Psychology.
    Pothos EM; Basieva I; Khrennikov A; Yearsley JM
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E55. PubMed ID: 31868162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comments on quantum probability theory.
    Sloman S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.
    Tentori K; Crupi V
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probability theory, not the very guide of life.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The rational status of quantum cognition.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Shiffrin RM; Yearsley JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jul; 146(7):968-987. PubMed ID: 28447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hilbert space multidimensional theory.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jul; 125(4):572-591. PubMed ID: 29952623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.