These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28879495)

  • 21. Representativeness and conjoint probability.
    Gavanski I; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Aug; 61(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 1920061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantum modeling of common sense.
    Noori HR; Spanagel R
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):302. PubMed ID: 23673048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology.
    Bruza PD; Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 19(7):383-93. PubMed ID: 26058709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Crupi V; Tentori K
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 26709413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR; Atmanspacher H; Pothos EM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):672-88. PubMed ID: 24027215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cold and hot cognition: quantum probability theory and realistic psychological modeling.
    Corr PJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 23673029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A quantum of truth? Querying the alternative benchmark for human cognition.
    Newell BR; van Ravenzwaaij D; Donkin C
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 23673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Uncertainty about the value of quantum probability for cognitive modeling.
    Behme C
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 23673026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neurocognitive processes underlying heuristic and normative probability judgments.
    Andersson L; Eriksson J; Stillesjö S; Juslin P; Nyberg L; Wirebring LK
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104153. PubMed ID: 31838247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review.
    Blalock SJ; Reyna VF
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):781-792. PubMed ID: 27505197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Open parallel cooperative and competitive decision processes: a potential provenance for quantum probability decision models.
    Fuss IG; Navarro DJ
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):818-43. PubMed ID: 24019237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
    Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Limitations of the Dirac formalism as a descriptive framework for cognition.
    Kaznatcheev A; Shultz TR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):292-3. PubMed ID: 23673038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantum principles in psychology: the debate, the evidence, and the future.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):310-27. PubMed ID: 23814869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment.
    Liberali JM; Reyna VF; Furlan S; Stein LM; Pardo ST
    J Behav Decis Mak; 2012 Oct; 25(4):361-381. PubMed ID: 23878413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A quantum probability account of order effects in inference.
    Trueblood JS; Busemeyer JR
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1518-52. PubMed ID: 21951058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.
    Hampton JA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 23673036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.