BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28879663)

  • 1. Roadside drug testing: An evaluation of the Alere DDS
    Rohrig TP; Moore CM; Stephens K; Cooper K; Coulter C; Baird T; Garnier M; Miller S; Tuyay J; Osawa K; Chou J; Nuss C; Collier J; Wittman KC
    Drug Test Anal; 2018 Apr; 10(4):663-670. PubMed ID: 28879663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
    Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Oral Fluid as a Specimen for DUID.
    Veitenheimer AM; Wagner JR
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):517-522. PubMed ID: 28633318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opioids in oral fluid of Spanish drivers.
    Herrera-Gómez F; García-Mingo M; Colás M; González-Luque JC; Álvarez FJ
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Jun; 187():35-39. PubMed ID: 29626744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roadside Drug Testing Approaches.
    Alhefeiti MA; Barker J; Shah I
    Molecules; 2021 May; 26(11):. PubMed ID: 34072538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
    Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of RapidSTAT®, DrugWipe® 6S, DrugScreen® 5TK and DrugScreen® 7TR for on-site drug testing in German police roadside traffic patrol.
    Liut J; Bott U; Madea B; Krämer M; Maas A
    Drug Test Anal; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1407-1416. PubMed ID: 35343088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toxicological oral fluid results among Spanish drivers testing positive on on-site drug controls from 2013 to 2015.
    Lema-Atán JÁ; de Castro A; Lendoiro E; López-Rivadulla M; Cruz A
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2019 Feb; 195():106-113. PubMed ID: 30611978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.
    Pehrsson A; Gunnar T; Engblom C; Seppä H; Jama A; Lillsunde P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 17640837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The utility of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) measures obtained from oral fluid samples in traffic safety.
    Romano E; Moore C; Kelley-Baker T; Torres-Saavedra PA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):667-672. PubMed ID: 31356118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oral Fluid and Drug Impairment: Pairing Toxicology with Drug Recognition Expert Observations.
    Truver MT; Palmquist KB; Swortwood MJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 2019 Sep; 43(8):637-643. PubMed ID: 31504595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of the Cozart DDS oral fluid collection device.
    Speedy T; Baldwin D; Jowett G; Gallina M; Jehanli A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):117-20. PubMed ID: 17624706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytical reliability of four oral fluid point-of-collection testing devices for drug detection in drivers.
    Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Rabelo-da-Ponte FD; Silvestrin R; Ornell R; Sousa T; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110434. PubMed ID: 32758788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence of psychoactive substances, alcohol and illicit drugs, in Spanish drivers: A roadside study in 2015.
    Domingo-Salvany A; Herrero MJ; Fernandez B; Perez J; Del Real P; González-Luque JC; de la Torre R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():253-259. PubMed ID: 28778032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User experience and operational feasibility of four point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices according to Brazilian traffic agents.
    Pechansky F; Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Roglio V; Telles YM; Silvestrin R; Pasa G; Sousa T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New psychoactive substances in oral fluid of French and Belgian drivers in 2016.
    Richeval C; Wille SMR; Nachon-Phanithavong M; Samyn N; Allorge D; Gaulier JM
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Jul; 57():1-3. PubMed ID: 29631107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Cangianelli L; Quintela O
    Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 18367979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roadside drug testing: comparison of two legal approaches in Belgium.
    Van der Linden T; Wille SM; Ramírez-Fernandez M; Verstraete AG; Samyn N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():148-55. PubMed ID: 25700110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of new psychoactive substances and prescription drugs in the Belgian driving under the influence of drugs population.
    Wille SMR; Richeval C; Nachon-Phanithavong M; Gaulier JM; Di Fazio V; Humbert L; Samyn N; Allorge D
    Drug Test Anal; 2018 Mar; 10(3):539-547. PubMed ID: 28640970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First evaluation of the possibility of testing for drugged driving using exhaled breath sampling.
    Beck O; Ullah S; Kronstrand R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 31039047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.