448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28881880)
1. Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies.
Laing P; Bress AP; Fang J; Peterson K; Adler DG; Gawron AJ
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.
Kahrilas PJ; Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Gyawali CP; Roman S; Smout AJ; Pandolfino JE;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):160-74. PubMed ID: 25469569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0: Diagnostic changes and clinical implications.
Sallette M; Lenz J; Mion F; Roman S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Jan; 35(1):e14467. PubMed ID: 36314395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders].
Sakai M; Saito H; Kuriyama K; Yoshida T; Kumakura Y; Hara K; Sohda M; Kuwano H; Shirabe K
Kyobu Geka; 2018 Sep; 71(10):894-899. PubMed ID: 30310046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.
Rohof WOA; Bredenoord AJ
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(8):37. PubMed ID: 28730503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0
Yadlapati R; Kahrilas PJ; Fox MR; Bredenoord AJ; Prakash Gyawali C; Roman S; Babaei A; Mittal RK; Rommel N; Savarino E; Sifrim D; Smout A; Vaezi MF; Zerbib F; Akiyama J; Bhatia S; Bor S; Carlson DA; Chen JW; Cisternas D; Cock C; Coss-Adame E; de Bortoli N; Defilippi C; Fass R; Ghoshal UC; Gonlachanvit S; Hani A; Hebbard GS; Wook Jung K; Katz P; Katzka DA; Khan A; Kohn GP; Lazarescu A; Lengliner J; Mittal SK; Omari T; Park MI; Penagini R; Pohl D; Richter JE; Serra J; Sweis R; Tack J; Tatum RP; Tutuian R; Vela MF; Wong RK; Wu JC; Xiao Y; Pandolfino JE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Jan; 33(1):e14058. PubMed ID: 33373111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The broad impact of functional lumen imaging probe panometry in addition to high-resolution manometry in an esophageal clinical practice.
Ellison A; Nguyen AD; Zhang J; Mendoza R; Davis D; Podgaetz E; Ward M; Reddy C; Souza R; Spechler SJ; Konda VJA
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36125222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Chicago Classification 3.0 Results in More Normal Findings and Fewer Hypotensive Findings With No Difference in Other Diagnoses.
Monrroy H; Cisternas D; Bilder C; Ditaranto A; Remes-Troche J; Meixueiro A; Zavala MA; Serra J; Marín I; Ruiz de León A; Pérez de la Serna J; Hani A; Leguizamo A; Abrahao L; Coello R; Valdovinos MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2017 Apr; 112(4):606-612. PubMed ID: 28139656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Improves Stratification of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Patients into Clinically Meaningful Subtypes: A Two-Center International Study.
Carmel M; Cohen DL; Hijazi B; Azzam N; Khoury T; Pagliaro M; Pesce M; Mari A
Dysphagia; 2024 Jun; 39(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 37934251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of motor diagnoses by Chicago Classification versions 2.0 and 3.0 on esophageal high-resolution manometry.
Patel A; Cassell B; Sainani N; Wang D; Shahid B; Bennett M; Mirza FA; Munigala S; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Jul; 29(7):. PubMed ID: 28229560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impaired bolus clearance in combined high-resolution esophageal manometry and impedance measurement helps to differentiate between esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalasia.
Zizer E; Seufferlein T; Hänle MM
Z Gastroenterol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 28068730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings.
Singendonk MM; Smits MJ; Heijting IE; van Wijk MP; Nurko S; Rosen R; Weijenborg PW; Abu-Assi R; Hoekman DR; Kuizenga-Wessel S; Seiboth G; Benninga MA; Omari TI; Kritas S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25521418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Differences between Chicago and traditional classifications in the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders with high-resolution manometry and topography of esophageal pressure].
Abreu-Y Abreu AT; González Sánchez CB; Villanueva Sáenz E; Valdovinos Díaz MA
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2010; 75(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 21169108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high-resolution manometry.
Krause AJ; Su H; Triggs JR; Beveridge C; Baumann AJ; Donnan E; Pandolfino JE; Carlson DA
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Mar; 33(3):e14000. PubMed ID: 33043557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid drink challenge test during esophageal high resolution manometry in patients with esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction.
Biasutto D; Mion F; Garros A; Roman S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13293. PubMed ID: 29356303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders by Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0.
Noh JH; Jung KW; Yoon IJ; Na HK; Ahn JY; Lee JH; Kim DH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Jung HY
J Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Jul; 29(3):326-334. PubMed ID: 37417259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry.
Fox MR; Pandolfino JE; Sweis R; Sauter M; Abreu Y Abreu AT; Anggiansah A; Bogte A; Bredenoord AJ; Dengler W; Elvevi A; Fruehauf H; Gellersen S; Ghosh S; Gyawali CP; Heinrich H; Hemmink M; Jafari J; Kaufman E; Kessing K; Kwiatek M; Lubomyr B; Banasiuk M; Mion F; Pérez-de-la-Serna J; Remes-Troche JM; Rohof W; Roman S; Ruiz-de-León A; Tutuian R; Uscinowicz M; Valdovinos MA; Vardar R; Velosa M; Waśko-Czopnik D; Weijenborg P; Wilshire C; Wright J; Zerbib F; Menne D
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(8):711-9. PubMed ID: 25185507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Botulinum toxin injection for hypercontractile or spastic esophageal motility disorders: may high-resolution manometry help to select cases?
Marjoux S; Brochard C; Roman S; Gincul R; Pagenault M; Ponchon T; Ropert A; Mion F
Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(8):735-41. PubMed ID: 25212219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic yield of adding solid food swallows during high-resolution manometry in esophageal motility disorders.
Araujo IK; Roman S; Napoléon M; Mion F
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 May; 33(5):e14060. PubMed ID: 33314459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Solid Swallow Examination During High Resolution Manometry and EGJ-Distensibility Help Identify Esophageal Outflow Obstruction in Non-obstructive Dysphagia.
Murray FR; Fischbach LM; Schindler V; Schnurre L; Hente JM; Tatu A; Pohl D
Dysphagia; 2022 Feb; 37(1):168-176. PubMed ID: 33609164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
