These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28882131)

  • 1. An evaluation of Interprofessional group antenatal care: a prospective comparative study.
    Hodgson ZG; Saxell L; Christians JK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):297. PubMed ID: 28882131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Infant Birthweight and Maternal Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tubay AT; Mansalis KA; Simpson MJ; Armitage NH; Briscoe G; Potts V
    Mil Med; 2019 May; 184(5-6):e440-e446. PubMed ID: 30535396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The experience of pregnancy and birth with midwives: results from the Canadian maternity experiences survey.
    O'Brien B; Chalmers B; Fell D; Heaman M; Darling EK; Herbert P
    Birth; 2011 Sep; 38(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 21884229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A family-oriented antenatal education program to improve birth preparedness and maternal-infant birth outcomes: A cross sectional evaluation study.
    Shimpuku Y; Madeni FE; Horiuchi S; Kubota K; Leshabari SC
    Reprod Health; 2019 Jul; 16(1):107. PubMed ID: 31311563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
    Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
    Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy.
    Butler MM; Sheehy L; Kington MM; Walsh MC; Brosnan MC; Murphy M; Naughton C; Drennan J; Barry T
    Midwifery; 2015 Apr; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 25554699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Birth preparedness among antenatal clients.
    Mutiso SM; Qureshi Z; Kinuthia J
    East Afr Med J; 2008 Jun; 85(6):275-83. PubMed ID: 18817024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does model of maternity care make a difference to birth outcomes for young women? A retrospective cohort study.
    Allen J; Gibbons K; Beckmann M; Tracy M; Stapleton H; Kildea S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 Aug; 52(8):1332-42. PubMed ID: 25952336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adolescent Pregnancy Guidelines.
    Fleming N; O'Driscoll T; Becker G; Spitzer RF;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Aug; 37(8):740-756. PubMed ID: 26474231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of midwife-led care versus obstetrician-led care for low-risk women in Japan.
    Iida M; Horiuchi S; Nagamori K
    Women Birth; 2014 Sep; 27(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 24906495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction.
    Floris L; Irion O; Bonnet J; Politis Mercier MP; de Labrusse C
    Women Birth; 2018 Apr; 31(2):124-133. PubMed ID: 28711398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of obesity on outcomes of midwife-led pregnancy and childbirth in a primary care population: a prospective cohort study.
    Daemers DO; Wijnen HA; van Limbeek EB; Budé LM; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Spaanderman ME; de Vries RG
    BJOG; 2014 Oct; 121(11):1403-13. PubMed ID: 24618305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Birth preparedness in antenatal care: effects of health center characteristics].
    Soubeiga D; Sia D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2013 Aug; 61(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 23810629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A
    Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mothers' satisfaction with group antenatal care versus individual antenatal care--a clinical trial.
    Andersson E; Christensson K; Hildingsson I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2013 Oct; 4(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 24041732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis.
    Symon A; Winter C; Cochrane L
    Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 25819706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving health literacy through group antenatal care: a prospective cohort study.
    Lori JR; Ofosu-Darkwah H; Boyd CJ; Banerjee T; Adanu RMK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):228. PubMed ID: 28705179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pregnancy and delivery satisfaction of 424 patients in Perinatal Health Network « Sécurité Naissance » of Pays-de-la-Loire area].
    Branger B; Le Coz F; Gillard P; Merot E; Winer N;
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 May; 43(5):361-70. PubMed ID: 23623437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a family-oriented antenatal group educational program in rural Tanzania: a pre-test/post-test study.
    Shimpuku Y; Madeni FE; Horiuchi S; Kubota K; Leshabari SC
    Reprod Health; 2018 Jun; 15(1):117. PubMed ID: 29954398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.