These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28882141)

  • 41. Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Hoyer-Sørensen C; Vistad I; Ballard K
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):973-9. PubMed ID: 22769732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Yi YX; Zhang W; Zhou Q; Guo WR; Su Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 21664034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
    Antoun L; Middleton L; Smith P; Saridogan E; Cooper K; Brocklehurst P; McKinnon W; Bevan S; Woolley R; Jones L; Fullard J; Morgan M; Roberts T; Clark TJ
    BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e070218. PubMed ID: 37669836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
    Herling SF
    Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
    Mourits MJ; Bijen CB; Arts HJ; ter Brugge HG; van der Sijde R; Paulsen L; Wijma J; Bongers MY; Post WJ; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):763-71. PubMed ID: 20638901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The benefits and challenges of robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Smorgick N; As-Sanie S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 26(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 24914631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Olsson JH; Ellstrom M; Hahlin M
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Apr; 103(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 8605132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.
    Herling SF; Møller AM; Palle C; Grynnerup A; Thomsen T
    Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.
    Rossitto C; Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Pizzacalla S; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():125-129. PubMed ID: 28753500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Operative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Conventional Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
    Fathi A; Saleh MM; Shetiwy M; Elzahaby IA; Farouk O; Shams N; Elghandour MF; Abouzid A
    Surg Innov; 2022 Oct; 29(5):590-599. PubMed ID: 34465254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design.
    Lelong B; de Chaisemartin C; Meillat H; Cournier S; Boher JM; Genre D; Karoui M; Tuech JJ; Delpero JR;
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Apr; 17(1):253. PubMed ID: 28399840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Supracervical hysterectomy.
    Kives S; Lefebvre G;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Jan; 32(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 20370984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Hysterectomy for benign pathology: Guidelines for clinical practice].
    Deffieux X; de Rochambeau B; Chêne G; Gauthier T; Huet S; Lamblin G; Agostini A; Marcelli M; Golfier F;
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1219-27. PubMed ID: 26530174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Minilaparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Current Practice Feasibility and Benefits: A Unicentric, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Béguinot M; Botchorishvili R; Comptour A; Curinier S; Campagne-Loiseau S; Chauvet P; Pereira B; Pouly JL; Rabischong B; Canis M; Bourdel N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):673-680. PubMed ID: 31173939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study.
    Usta TA; Karacan T; Naki MM; Calık A; Turkgeldi L; Kasimogullari V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 24791965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical assessment for three routes of hysterectomy.
    Zhu L; Lang JH; Liu CY; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Fan R
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 19302739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases.
    Claerhout F; Deprest J
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 19(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 15985252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
    Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
    Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
    Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.