BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28882575)

  • 1. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Abdelfatah MM; Grimm IS; Gangarosa LM; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Feb; 87(2):495-500. PubMed ID: 28882575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: Initial assessment.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Hasan MK; Navaneethan U; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2017 May; 29(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 27878861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The diagnostic and cellularity yield of reverse bevel versus fork-tip fine needle biopsy.
    Abdelfatah MM; Hamed A; Koutlas NJ; Aly FZ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Aug; 46(8):649-655. PubMed ID: 29737018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
    Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.
    Gimeno-García AZ; Elwassief A; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sahai AV
    Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 24877242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Two Specialized Histology Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Pilot Study.
    Hashimoto R; Lee DP; Samarasena JB; Chandan VS; Guo W; Lee JG; Chang KJ
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 May; 66(5):1700-1706. PubMed ID: 32556821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mirzaie V; Sotoudeh M; Nikmanesh A; Hosseini R; Muthusamy R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Sep; 98(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 37098399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.