192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28882680)
1. Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.
Berglund Scherwitzl E; Lundberg O; Kopp Kallner H; Gemzell Danielsson K; Trussell J; Scherwitzl R
Contraception; 2017 Dec; 96(6):420-425. PubMed ID: 28882680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception.
Berglund Scherwitzl E; Gemzell Danielsson K; Sellberg JA; Scherwitzl R
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Jun; 21(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 27003381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perfect- and typical-use effectiveness of the Dot fertility app over 13 cycles: results from a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial.
Jennings V; Haile LT; Simmons RG; Spieler J; Shattuck D
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Apr; 24(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 30880509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Calculation of the Pearl Index of Lady-Comp, Baby-Comp and Pearly cycle computers used as a contraceptive method].
Binkiewicz P; Michaluk K; Demiańczyk A
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):834-9. PubMed ID: 21365899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Natural Cycles app: contraceptive outcomes and demographic analysis of UK users.
Pearson JT; Chelstowska M; Rowland SP; Mcilwaine E; Benhar E; Berglund Scherwitzl E; Walker S; Gemzell Danielsson K; Scherwitzl R
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Apr; 26(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 33539252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Typical use effectiveness of Natural Cycles: postmarket surveillance study investigating the impact of previous contraceptive choice on the risk of unintended pregnancy.
Bull J; Rowland S; Lundberg O; Berglund-Scherwitzl E; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Trussell J; Scherwitzl R
BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e026474. PubMed ID: 30904873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the effectiveness of selected natural fertility symptoms used for contraception: estimation of the Pearl index of Lady-Comp, Pearly and Daysy cycle computers based on 10 years of observation in the Polish market.
Demiańczyk A; Michaluk K
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(12):793-797. PubMed ID: 28098936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraceptive Effectiveness of an FDA-Cleared Birth Control App: Results from the Natural Cycles U.S. Cohort.
Pearson JT; Chelstowska M; Rowland SP; Benhar E; Kopp-Kallner H; Berglund Scherwitzl E; Acuna J; Gemzell Danielsson K; Scherwitzl R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2021 Jun; 30(6):782-788. PubMed ID: 33370220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating six-cycle efficacy of the Dot app for pregnancy prevention.
Jennings VH; Haile LT; Simmons RG; Fultz HM; Shattuck D
Contraception; 2019 Jan; 99(1):52-55. PubMed ID: 30316782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving usability and pregnancy rates of a fertility monitor by an additional mobile application: results of a retrospective efficacy study of Daysy and DaysyView app.
Koch MC; Lermann J; van de Roemer N; Renner SK; Burghaus S; Hackl J; Dittrich R; Kehl S; Oppelt PG; Hildebrandt T; Hack CC; Pöhls UG; Renner SP; Thiel FC
Reprod Health; 2018 Mar; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 29499716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Efficacy of an App-Based Method of Family Planning: The Dot Study Protocol.
Simmons RG; Shattuck DC; Jennings VH
JMIR Res Protoc; 2017 Jan; 6(1):e5. PubMed ID: 28100441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short- and long-term effect of contraceptive methods on fecundity.
Berglund Scherwitzl E; Lundberg O; Kopp Kallner H; Rowland SP; Holte J; Trussell J; Gemzell Danielsson K; Scherwitzl R
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Aug; 24(4):260-265. PubMed ID: 31223036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the Bioself 110 electronic fertility indicator as a contraceptive aid.
Flynn A; Pulcrano J; Royston P; Spieler J
Contraception; 1991 Aug; 44(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 1893707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fecundability in relation to use of mobile computing apps to track the menstrual cycle.
Stanford JB; Willis SK; Hatch EE; Rothman KJ; Wise LA
Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2245-2252. PubMed ID: 32910202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural methods of family planning.
Flynn AM
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Dec; 11(3):661-78. PubMed ID: 6509855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of two methods of natural family planning in Columbia.
Medina JE; Cifuentes A; Abernathy JR; Spieler JM; Wade ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Dec; 138(8):1142-7. PubMed ID: 7446621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective clinical trial of contraceptive effectiveness of the electronic fertility indicator Ladycomp/Babycomp.
Freundl G; Frank-Herrmann P; Godehardt E; Klemm R; Bachhofer M
Adv Contracept; 1998 Jun; 14(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 9820928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of determining the fertile window with the individualised Natural Cycles algorithm over calendar-based methods.
Kleinschmidt TK; Bull JR; Lavorini V; Rowland SP; Pearson JT; Scherwitzl EB; Scherwitzl R; Danielsson KG
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Dec; 24(6):457-463. PubMed ID: 31738859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Time to Pregnancy for Women Using a Fertility Awareness Based Mobile Application to Plan a Pregnancy.
Favaro C; Pearson JT; Rowland SP; Jukic AM; Chelstowska M; Berglund Scherwitzl E; Scherwitzl R; Gemzell Danielsson K; Harper J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2021 Nov; 30(11):1538-1545. PubMed ID: 34495761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
