146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28883302)
1. Effect of framework design on fracture load after thermal cycling and mechanical loading of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses.
Komine F; Kamio S; Takata H; Yagawa S; Taguchi S; Taguchi K; Hashiguchi A; Matsumura H
Dent Mater J; 2018 Jan; 37(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28883302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of framework design and layering material on fracture strength of implant-supported zirconia-based molar crowns.
Kamio S; Komine F; Taguchi K; Iwasaki T; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1407-13. PubMed ID: 25115334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations.
Taguchi K; Komine F; Fushiki R; Blatz MB; Kamio S; Matsumura H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):983-91. PubMed ID: 23730807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses.
Kondo T; Komine F; Honda J; Takata H; Moriya Y
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 30446411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture load of tooth-implant-retained zirconia ceramic fixed dental prostheses: effect of span length and preparation design.
Gabbert O; Karatzogiannis E; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Karl J; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):719-725. PubMed ID: 21812819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of fracture load of implant-supported, zirconia-based, porcelain- and composite-layered restorations after artificial aging.
Komine F; Taguchi K; Fushiki R; Kamio S; Iwasaki T; Matsumura H
Dent Mater J; 2014; 33(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 25273039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of attaching mechanical retentive devices onto frameworks on fracture resistance of implant-supported zirconia crowns.
Kobayashi T; Honda J; Kubochi K; Iwasaki T; Watanabe Y; Komine F
Dent Mater J; 2024 Jun; 43(3):359-366. PubMed ID: 38583996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture force of cantilevered zirconia frameworks: an in vitro study.
Chong KK; Palamara J; Wong RH; Judge RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):849-56. PubMed ID: 24836535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture loads of screw-retained implant-supported zirconia prostheses after thermal and mechanical stress.
Honda J; Komine F; Kusaba K; Kitani J; Matsushima K; Matsumura H
J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Jul; 64(3):313-318. PubMed ID: 31859081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static and Fatigue Loading of Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Rayyan MM; Abdallah J; Segaan LG; Bonfante EA; Osman E
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 32271486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro evaluation of fracture load of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses fabricated with different veneer materials.
Takata H; Komine F; Honda J; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 29484710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
