These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28883605)

  • 1. Effect of a hyperbaric environment (diving conditions) on adhesive restorations: an in vitro study.
    Mocquot C; Cabrera A; Colon P; Bosco J; Grosgogeat B; Pradelle-Plasse N
    Br Dent J; 2017 Sep; 223(5):347-351. PubMed ID: 28883605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations.
    Awliya WY; El-Sahn AM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations.
    Pinna R; Usai P; Filigheddu E; Garcia-Godoy F; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):285-292. PubMed ID: 29178733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations.
    Besnault C; Attal JP
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12967073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique.
    Yap AU; Mok BY; Pearson G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micromechanical Intervention in Sandwich Restoration.
    Khan TN; Ali Abidi SY; Nawaz Khan KB; Ahmed S; Rehman Qazi FU; Saeed N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):781-4. PubMed ID: 26577960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of remaining demineralised dentine on dental microleakage accessed by a dye penetration: how to inhibit microleakage?
    Piemjai M; Watanabe A; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 15240068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.