These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28883677)

  • 1. Comparison of Results of Measurement of Dimensions of the Placed Dental Implants on Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Dimensions of the Producers of the Implants.
    Repesa M; Sofic A; Jakupovic S; Tosum S; Kazazic L; Dervisevic A
    Acta Inform Med; 2017 Jun; 25(2):116-120. PubMed ID: 28883677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Different Preosteotomy Determinants as Affecting the Success of Implant Therapy: A "CBCT"-based Clinical Study.
    Jain S; Kapoor K; Sethi K; Dahiya DR; Singh B; Sangwan R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1212-1216. PubMed ID: 31883259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study.
    Schropp L; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 24890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of radiographic measurements for implant planning using cone-beam and helical computer tomography.
    Leung CKK; Pow EHN; Li TKL; Lo ECM; Chow TW
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Aug; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 27477327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective assessment of dental implant-related perforations of relevant anatomical structures and inadequate spacing between implants/teeth using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos N; Mancini AXM; Oliveira ML; Oliveira-Santos C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3281-3288. PubMed ID: 31960132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study.
    Özalp Ö; Tezerişener HA; Kocabalkan B; Büyükkaplan UŞ; Özarslan MM; Şimşek Kaya G; Altay MA; Sindel A
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Dec; 48(4):269-275. PubMed ID: 30607351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT.
    Raes F; Renckens L; Aps J; Cosyn J; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 22008055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
    Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial bone alterations on maxillary anterior single implants for immediate placement and provisionalization following tooth extraction: a superimposed cone beam computed tomography study.
    Morimoto T; Tsukiyama Y; Morimoto K; Koyano K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1383-9. PubMed ID: 25179799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
    Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flapless, CBCT-guided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1-year follow-up.
    Fornell J; Johansson LÅ; Bolin A; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 21443611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mesiodistal Measurements for Dental Implant Planning: A Prospective Clinical Study of Linear Measurements on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images in Comparison with Caliper-Based Measurements on Plaster Casts.
    Vazquez L; Buser R; Carrel JP
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 36135164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
    Vera C; De Kok IJ; Chen W; Reside G; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 23057042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Predictability of Suitable Implant Lengths as related to Accurate Treatment Planning using Recent Roentgenographic Measures: A Key to Success.
    Suvarna S; Singh RK; Pachar RB; Kundra S; Arya S; Mehta LK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 29807963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.