225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28884346)
1. Quality of randomized controlled trials published in the International Urogynecology Journal 2007-2016.
Kim KS; Chung JH; Jo JK; Kim JH; Kim S; Cho JM; Cho HJ; Choi HY; Lee SW
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1011-1017. PubMed ID: 28884346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized controlled trials on erectile dysfunction: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact (2007-2018).
Kim KS; Chung JH; Lee SW
Int J Impot Res; 2020 Mar; 32(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 31024112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting of randomized controlled trials in andrology journals: a quality assessment.
Jo JK; Chung JH; Kim KS; Song SH; Lee SW
J Sex Med; 2015 Feb; 12(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 25537865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled trials in the journal of sexual medicine: a quality assessment and relevant clinical impact.
Jo JK; Chung JH; Kim KS; Lee JW; Lee SW
J Sex Med; 2014 Apr; 11(4):894-900. PubMed ID: 24548282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality Assessment and Relevant Clinical Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials of Varicocele: Next Step to Good-Quality Randomized Controlled Trial of Varicocele Treatment.
Kim KS; Chung JH; Park HJ; Shin WJ; Lee BH; Lee SW
World J Mens Health; 2022 Apr; 40(2):290-298. PubMed ID: 34169678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials published in neurourology and urodynamics from 1993 to 2012.
Lee JW; Chung JH; Jo JK; Lee SW
Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Jun; 33(5):472-4. PubMed ID: 23868818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessments of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in International Journal of Urology from 1994 to 2011.
Cho HJ; Chung JH; Jo JK; Kang DH; Cho JM; Yoo TK; Lee SW
Int J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1212-9. PubMed ID: 23573913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Impotence Research: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact.
Kim KS; Jo JK; Chung JH; Kim JH; Choi HY; Lee SW
Int J Impot Res; 2017 Mar; 29(2):65-69. PubMed ID: 27904149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.
Sung JM; Kim JY; Kwon BS; Kim KN
J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Feb; 37(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 35471715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized controlled trials in endourology: a quality assessment.
Jo JK; Autorino R; Chung JH; Kim KS; Lee JW; Baek EJ; Lee SW
J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):1055-60. PubMed ID: 23767666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting Quality Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology: A Methodological Assessment.
Kim SY; Kim KN; Kim DW; Kang MS
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2021 Apr; 33(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 31702588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of randomized controlled trials in Rheumatology International from 1981 to 2012: methodological assessment.
Lee JW; Chung JH; Jo JK; Lee SW
Rheumatol Int; 2014 Sep; 34(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 24567203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Quality Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials about Erectile Dysfunction.
Chung JH; Lee JW; Jo JK; Kim KS; Lee SW
World J Mens Health; 2013 Aug; 31(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 24044111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement.
Vinkers CH; Lamberink HJ; Tijdink JK; Heus P; Bouter L; Glasziou P; Moher D; Damen JA; Hooft L; Otte WM
PLoS Biol; 2021 Apr; 19(4):e3001162. PubMed ID: 33872298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urologic Literature.
Narayan VM; Cone EB; Smith D; Scales CD; Dahm P
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):1044-1049. PubMed ID: 27503840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
Can OS; Yilmaz AA; Hasdogan M; Alkaya F; Turhan SC; Can MF; Alanoglu Z
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21037480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better?
Balasubramanian SP; Wiener M; Alshameeri Z; Tiruvoipati R; Elbourne D; Reed MW
Ann Surg; 2006 Nov; 244(5):663-7. PubMed ID: 17060756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review of reporting in randomized controlled trials in Dermatologic Surgery: Jadad scores, power analysis, and sample size determination.
Alam M; Rauf M; Ali S; Nodzenski M; Minkis K
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1299-305. PubMed ID: 25357168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science from 1986 to 2011.
Chung JH; Kang DH; Jo JK; Lee SW
J Korean Med Sci; 2012 Sep; 27(9):973-80. PubMed ID: 22969240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
