315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28884356)
1. Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study.
Lisson CS; Lisson CG; Flosdorf K; Mayer-Steinacker R; Schultheiss M; von Baer A; Barth TFE; Beer AJ; Baumhauer M; Meier R; Beer M; Schmidt SA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):468-477. PubMed ID: 28884356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.
De Coninck T; Jans L; Sys G; Huysse W; Verstraeten T; Forsyth R; Poffyn B; Verstraete K
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3140-52. PubMed ID: 23771600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?
Douis H; Parry M; Vaiyapuri S; Davies AM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):398-409. PubMed ID: 28695356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can imaging criteria distinguish enchondroma from grade 1 chondrosarcoma?
Crim J; Schmidt R; Layfield L; Hanrahan C; Manaster BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2222-30. PubMed ID: 26220916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma.
Choi BB; Jee WH; Sunwoo HJ; Cho JH; Kim JY; Chun KA; Hong SJ; Chung HW; Sung MS; Lee YS; Chung YG
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):542-7. PubMed ID: 23041161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.
Murphey MD; Flemming DJ; Boyea SR; Bojescul JA; Sweet DE; Temple HT
Radiographics; 1998; 18(5):1213-37; quiz 1244-5. PubMed ID: 9747616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging-based texture analysis in differentiating enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.
Cilengir AH; Evrimler S; Serel TA; Uluc E; Tosun O
Skeletal Radiol; 2023 May; 52(5):1039-1049. PubMed ID: 36434265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma.
Douis H; Singh L; Saifuddin A
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):232-40. PubMed ID: 24337911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiomics models based on non-enhanced MRI can differentiate chondrosarcoma from enchondroma].
Pan J; Jiang Y; Zhan Y; Zuo P; Fang Y; Li S; Hong G
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2020 Apr; 40(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 32895139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiomics Nomograms Based on Non-enhanced MRI and Clinical Risk Factors for the Differentiation of Chondrosarcoma from Enchondroma.
Pan J; Zhang K; Le H; Jiang Y; Li W; Geng Y; Li S; Hong G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Oct; 54(4):1314-1323. PubMed ID: 33949727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Grading of Cartilaginous Bone Tumors: Added Value of Quantitative Texture Analysis.
Fritz B; Müller DA; Sutter R; Wurnig MC; Wagner MW; Pfirrmann CWA; Fischer MA
Invest Radiol; 2018 Nov; 53(11):663-672. PubMed ID: 29863601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management.
Wang XL; De Beuckeleer LH; De Schepper AM; Van Marck E
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(6):1054-7. PubMed ID: 11419152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: Preoperative differentiation by using MRI-based 3D texture analysis.
Xiao DD; Yan PF; Wang YX; Osman MS; Zhao HY
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Oct; 173():84-90. PubMed ID: 30092408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative CT texture analysis for evaluating histologic grade of urothelial carcinoma.
Zhang GM; Sun H; Shi B; Jin ZY; Xue HD
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Feb; 42(2):561-568. PubMed ID: 27604896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative SPECT/CT for differentiating between enchondroma and grade I chondrosarcoma.
Choi WH; Han EJ; Chang KB; Joo MW
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10587. PubMed ID: 32601314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of Texture Analysis on Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR for Detecting Liver Fibrosis in a Rat Model.
Xu J; Wang X; Jin ZY; You Y; Wang Q; Wang ST; Xue HD
Chin Med Sci J; 2019 Mar; 34(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 30961777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How safe is curettage of low-grade cartilaginous neoplasms diagnosed by imaging with or without pre-operative needle biopsy?
Brown MT; Gikas PD; Bhamra JS; Skinner JA; Aston WJ; Pollock RC; Saifuddin A; Briggs TW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug; 96-B(8):1098-105. PubMed ID: 25086127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma.
Yapar A; Ulucaköy C; Sezgin EA; Atalay İB; Ekşioğlu MF
Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2020; 31(2):286-290. PubMed ID: 32584727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI texture features differentiate clinicopathological characteristics of cervical carcinoma.
Wang M; Perucho JAU; Tse KY; Chu MMY; Ip P; Lee EYP
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5384-5391. PubMed ID: 32382845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterizing MRI features of rectal cancers with different KRAS status.
Xu Y; Xu Q; Ma Y; Duan J; Zhang H; Liu T; Li L; Sun H; Shi K; Xie S; Wang W
BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1111. PubMed ID: 31727020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]