These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28884577)

  • 21. Contaminant desorption during long-term leaching of hydroxide-weathered Hanford sediments.
    Thompson A; Steefel CI; Perdrial N; Chorover I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1992-7. PubMed ID: 20170202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of saline waste solution infiltration rates on uranium retention and spatial distribution in Hanford sediments.
    Wan J; Tokunaga TK; Kim Y; Wang Z; Lanzirotti A; Saiz E; Serne RJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Mar; 42(6):1973-8. PubMed ID: 18409623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interactions among phosphate amendments, microbes and uranium mobility in contaminated sediments.
    Knox AS; Brigmon RL; Kaplan DI; Paller MH
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jun; 395(2-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 18374392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uncertainty and variability in laboratory derived sorption parameters of sediments from a uranium in situ recovery site.
    Dangelmayr MA; Reimus PW; Johnson RH; Clay JT; Stone JJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jun; 213():28-39. PubMed ID: 29691066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fate of 90Sr and U(VI) in Dounreay sediments following saline inundation and erosion.
    Eagling J; Worsfold PJ; Blake WH; Keith-Roach MJ
    Chemosphere; 2013 Aug; 92(8):911-7. PubMed ID: 23541149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Uranium deposition in a weathered fractured saprolite/shale.
    Phillips DH; Watson DB; Roh Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Nov; 41(22):7653-60. PubMed ID: 18075070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Establishing a geochemical heterogeneity model for a contaminated vadose zone--aquifer system.
    Murray CJ; Zachara JM; McKinley JP; Ward A; Bott YJ; Draper K; Moore D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():122-40. PubMed ID: 23664489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immobilization of U(VI) from oxic groundwater by Hanford 300 Area sediments and effects of Columbia River water.
    Ahmed B; Cao B; Mishra B; Boyanov MI; Kemner KM; Fredrickson JK; Beyenal H
    Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(13):3989-98. PubMed ID: 22683408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transport of U(VI) through sediments amended with phosphate to induce in situ uranium immobilization.
    Mehta VS; Maillot F; Wang Z; Catalano JG; Giammar DE
    Water Res; 2015 Feb; 69():307-317. PubMed ID: 25497429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Potential for U sequestration with select minerals and sediments via base treatment.
    Emerson HP; Di Pietro S; Katsenovich Y; Szecsody J
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():108-114. PubMed ID: 29908396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantification of kinetic rate law parameters for the dissolution of natural autunite in the presence of aqueous bicarbonate ions at high concentrations.
    Gudavalli R; Katsenovich Y; Wellman D
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Oct; 190-191():1-9. PubMed ID: 29729585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cryogenic laser induced U(VI) fluorescence studies of a U(VI) substituted natural calcite: implications to U(VI) speciation in contaminated Hanford sediments.
    Wang Z; Zachara JM; Mckinley JP; Smith SC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(8):2651-9. PubMed ID: 15884362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Boltwoodite [K(UO2)(SiO3OH)(H2O)1.5] and compreignacite K2[(UO2)3O2(OH)3]2.7H2O characterized by laser fluorescence spectroscopy.
    Arnold T; Baumann N
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2009 Jan; 71(5):1964-8. PubMed ID: 18789751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Isotopic tracking of Hanford 300 area derived uranium in the Columbia River.
    Christensen JN; Dresel PE; Conrad ME; Patton GW; DePaolo DJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):8855-62. PubMed ID: 21033660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advective removal of intraparticle uranium from contaminated vadose zone sediments, Hanford, U.S.
    Ilton ES; Qafoku NP; Liu C; Moore DA; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Mar; 42(5):1565-71. PubMed ID: 18441804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. U(VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments at the Hanford Site.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Brown CF; Last GV
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):255-69. PubMed ID: 17499879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of diffusive transport limitations on UO2 dissolution.
    Giammar DE; Cerrato JM; Mehta V; Wang Z; Wang Y; Pepping TJ; Ulrich KU; Lezama-Pacheco JS; Bargar JR
    Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):6023-32. PubMed ID: 22980573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Colloid formation in Hanford sediments reacted with simulated tank waste.
    Mashal K; Harsh JB; Flury M; Felmy AR; Zhao H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(21):5750-6. PubMed ID: 15575296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Potential remediation approach for uranium-contaminated groundwaters through potassium uranyl vanadate precipitation.
    Tokunaga TK; Kim Y; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jul; 43(14):5467-71. PubMed ID: 19708383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Kinetics of uranium(VI) desorption from contaminated sediments: effect of geochemical conditions and model evaluation.
    Liu C; Shi Z; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 43(17):6560-6. PubMed ID: 19764217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.