649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28886075)
1. Incorporating abundance information and guiding variable selection for climate-based ensemble forecasting of species' distributional shifts.
Tanner EP; Papeş M; Elmore RD; Fuhlendorf SD; Davis CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184316. PubMed ID: 28886075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Habitat availability and gene flow influence diverging local population trajectories under scenarios of climate change: a place-based approach.
Schwalm D; Epps CW; Rodhouse TJ; Monahan WB; Castillo JA; Ray C; Jeffress MR
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Apr; 22(4):1572-84. PubMed ID: 26667878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into species distribution models alters forecasts of climate-mediated range shifts.
Crase B; Liedloff A; Vesk PA; Fukuda Y; Wintle BA
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Aug; 20(8):2566-79. PubMed ID: 24845950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Community science validates climate suitability projections from ecological niche modeling.
Saunders SP; Michel NL; Bateman BL; Wilsey CB; Dale K; LeBaron GS; Langham GM
Ecol Appl; 2020 Sep; 30(6):e02128. PubMed ID: 32223029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refining climate change projections for organisms with low dispersal abilities: a case study of the Caspian whip snake.
Sahlean TC; Gherghel I; Papeş M; Strugariu A; Zamfirescu ŞR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91994. PubMed ID: 24670422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remote-sensing based approach to forecast habitat quality under climate change scenarios.
Requena-Mullor JM; López E; Castro AJ; Alcaraz-Segura D; Castro H; Reyes A; Cabello J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172107. PubMed ID: 28257501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A framework for using niche models to estimate impacts of climate change on species distributions.
Anderson RP
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Sep; 1297():8-28. PubMed ID: 25098379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating mechanistic and correlative niche models to unravel range-limiting processes in a temperate amphibian.
Enriquez-Urzelai U; Kearney MR; Nicieza AG; Tingley R
Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Aug; 25(8):2633-2647. PubMed ID: 31050846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Major challenges for correlational ecological niche model projections to future climate conditions.
Peterson AT; Cobos ME; Jiménez-García D
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Oct; 1429(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 29923606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the model: expert knowledge improves predictions of species' fates under climate change.
Reside AE; Critchell K; Crayn DM; Goosem M; Goosem S; Hoskin CJ; Sydes T; Vanderduys EP; Pressey RL
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jan; 29(1):e01824. PubMed ID: 30390399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forecasting distributions of an aquatic invasive species (Nitellopsis obtusa) under future climate scenarios.
Romero-Alvarez D; Escobar LE; Varela S; Larkin DJ; Phelps NBD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180930. PubMed ID: 28704433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling distribution in European stream macroinvertebrates under future climates.
Domisch S; Araújo MB; Bonada N; Pauls SU; Jähnig SC; Haase P
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Mar; 19(3):752-62. PubMed ID: 23504833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tests of species-specific models reveal the importance of drought in postglacial range shifts of a Mediterranean-climate tree: insights from integrative distributional, demographic and coalescent modelling and ABC model selection.
Bemmels JB; Title PO; Ortego J; Knowles LL
Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4889-906. PubMed ID: 27540890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Climate-driven geographic distribution of the desert locust during recession periods: Subspecies' niche differentiation and relative risks under scenarios of climate change.
Meynard CN; Gay PE; Lecoq M; Foucart A; Piou C; Chapuis MP
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Nov; 23(11):4739-4749. PubMed ID: 28464493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increase in quantity and quality of suitable areas for invasive species as climate changes.
Bertelsmeier C; Luque GM; Courchamp F
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1458-67. PubMed ID: 23869583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How complex should models be? Comparing correlative and mechanistic range dynamics models.
Fordham DA; Bertelsmeier C; Brook BW; Early R; Neto D; Brown SC; Ollier S; Araújo MB
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Mar; 24(3):1357-1370. PubMed ID: 29152817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forecasting distributional responses of limber pine to climate change at management-relevant scales in Rocky Mountain National Park.
Monahan WB; Cook T; Melton F; Connor J; Bobowski B
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83163. PubMed ID: 24391742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Population dynamics can be more important than physiological limits for determining range shifts under climate change.
Fordham DA; Mellin C; Russell BD; Akçakaya RH; Bradshaw CJ; Aiello-Lammens ME; Caley JM; Connell SD; Mayfield S; Shepherd SA; Brook BW
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Oct; 19(10):3224-37. PubMed ID: 23907833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanistic variables can enhance predictive models of endotherm distributions: the American pika under current, past, and future climates.
Mathewson PD; Moyer-Horner L; Beever EA; Briscoe NJ; Kearney M; Yahn JM; Porter WP
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Mar; 23(3):1048-1064. PubMed ID: 27500587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the use of species distribution models in conservation planning and management under climate change.
Porfirio LL; Harris RM; Lefroy EC; Hugh S; Gould SF; Lee G; Bindoff NL; Mackey B
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113749. PubMed ID: 25420020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
