BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28886887)

  • 1. Making medicine; producing pleasure: A critical examination of medicinal cannabis policy and law in Victoria, Australia.
    Lancaster K; Seear K; Ritter A
    Int J Drug Policy; 2017 Nov; 49():117-125. PubMed ID: 28886887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MEDICINAL CANNABIS LAW REFORM IN AUSTRALIA.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2016 Mar; 23(3):497-515. PubMed ID: 27323630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
    Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Gifford-Meuleveld L; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
    Workplace Health Saf; 2015 Apr; 63(4):139-64. PubMed ID: 25862727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children as voices and images for medicinal cannabis law reform.
    Freckelton Ao Qc I
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2021 Dec; 39(Suppl 1):4-25. PubMed ID: 34719005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Building smart cannabis policy from the science up.
    Weiss SRB; Howlett KD; Baler RD
    Int J Drug Policy; 2017 Apr; 42():39-49. PubMed ID: 28189459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observations of the role of science in the United States medical cannabis state policies: Lessons learnt.
    Grbic J; Goddard P; Ryder D
    Int J Drug Policy; 2017 Apr; 42():109-114. PubMed ID: 28190671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping regulatory models for medicinal cannabis: a matrix of options.
    Belackova V; Shanahan M; Ritter A
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Aug; 42(4):403-411. PubMed ID: 28553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moral regulation and the presumption of guilt in Health Canada's medical cannabis policy and practice.
    Lucas P
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Jul; 20(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 19124233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Producing the 'problem of drugs': A cross national-comparison of 'recovery' discourse in two Australian and British reports.
    Lancaster K; Duke K; Ritter A
    Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Jul; 26(7):617-25. PubMed ID: 25962733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six policy lessons relevant to cannabis legalization.
    Shover CL; Humphreys K
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2019; 45(6):698-706. PubMed ID: 30870053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laws prohibiting peer distribution of injecting equipment in Australia: A critical analysis of their effects.
    Lancaster K; Seear K; Treloar C
    Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1198-206. PubMed ID: 26118796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does liberalizing cannabis laws increase cannabis use?
    Williams J; Bretteville-Jensen AL
    J Health Econ; 2014 Jul; 36():20-32. PubMed ID: 24727348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gambling and Cannabis Use: Clinical and Policy Implications.
    Winters KC; Whelan JP
    J Gambl Stud; 2020 Mar; 36(1):223-241. PubMed ID: 31828696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MEDICINAL CANNABIS LAW REFORM: LESSONS FROM CANADIAN LITIGATION.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2015 Jun; 22(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 26349373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based policy? The re-medicalization of cannabis and the role of expert committees in the UK, 1972-1982.
    Taylor SL
    Int J Drug Policy; 2016 Nov; 37():129-135. PubMed ID: 27477790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicinal cannabis and driving: the intersection of health and road safety policy.
    Perkins D; Brophy H; McGregor IS; O'Brien P; Quilter J; McNamara L; Sarris J; Stevenson M; Gleeson P; Sinclair J; Dietze P
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Nov; 97():103307. PubMed ID: 34107448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comment on the Central Drug Authority's position statement on cannabis.
    Scott K
    S Afr Med J; 2016 May; 106(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 27245714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical Marijuana programs: implications for cannabis control policy--observations from Canada.
    Fischer B; Kuganesan S; Room R
    Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Jan; 26(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 25287942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmaceuticals issue brief: medical marijuana: year end report-2002.
    Herstek J; Watson A; Kammer C
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2002 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 12856685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical examination of the definition of 'psychoactive effect' in Australian drug legislation.
    Barratt MJ; Seear K; Lancaster K
    Int J Drug Policy; 2017 Feb; 40():16-25. PubMed ID: 27884504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.