These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28886951)
1. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores. Dejak B; Młotkowski A J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 28886951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of ferrule effect and length of cast and FRC posts on the stresses in anterior teeth. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):e227-37. PubMed ID: 23870819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials. Dejak B; Młotkowski A; Langot C Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 22209573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of fiber insertion and different material type on stress distribution in endocrown restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Yildirim G; Demir C; Güven MÇ; Koç O; Dalkiliç EE Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Oct; 25(13):1509-1519. PubMed ID: 34964689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Valentino B; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture strength of custom-fabricated Celay all-ceramic post and core restored endodontically treated teeth. Zhang YX; Zhang WH; Lu ZY; Wang KL Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Nov; 119(21):1815-20. PubMed ID: 17097037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the biomechanical effects of the post-core crown, endocrown and inlay crown after deep margin elevation and its clinical significance. Wu F; Su X; Shi Y; Bai J; Feng J; Sun X; Wang X; Wang H; Wen J; Kang J BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):990. PubMed ID: 39180031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Madruga CFL; Valera MC; Borges ALS; Bresciani E; de Melo RM Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 29935769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. Rosentritt M; Fürer C; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 27(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 10931252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth. Bankoğlu Güngör M; Turhan Bal B; Yilmaz H; Aydin C; Karakoca Nemli S Dent Mater J; 2017 Mar; 36(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 28111383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. Belleflamme MM; Geerts SO; Louwette MM; Grenade CF; Vanheusden AJ; Mainjot AK J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():1-7. PubMed ID: 28456557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns. Rocca GT; Daher R; Saratti CM; Sedlacek R; Suchy T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():41-50. PubMed ID: 29107134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis. Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic properties of fracture of dental restorative materials and endocrown restorations under quasi-static loading. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Dubytskyi O Dent Mater; 2020 May; 36(5):617-625. PubMed ID: 32299664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]