143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28887829)
1. Using Public Data for Comparative Proteome Analysis in Precision Medicine Programs.
Hughes CS; Morin GB
Proteomics Clin Appl; 2018 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 28887829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parsing and Quantification of Raw Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer Data Using RawQuant.
Kovalchik KA; Moggridge S; Chen DDY; Morin GB; Hughes CS
J Proteome Res; 2018 Jun; 17(6):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 29682972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic evaluation of label-free and super-SILAC quantification for proteome expression analysis.
Tebbe A; Klammer M; Sighart S; Schaab C; Daub H
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2015 May; 29(9):795-801. PubMed ID: 26377007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Characteristics of Reporter Ion Signal Acquired in the Orbitrap Analyzer for Isobaric Mass Tag Proteome Quantification Experiments.
Hughes CS; Zhu C; Spicer V; Krokhin OV; Morin GB
J Proteome Res; 2017 May; 16(5):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 28418254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating Acquisition Performance on the Orbitrap Fusion When Using Tandem MS/MS/MS Scanning with Isobaric Tags.
Hughes CS; Spicer V; Krokhin OV; Morin GB
J Proteome Res; 2017 May; 16(5):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 28418257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmarking stable isotope labeling based quantitative proteomics.
Altelaar AF; Frese CK; Preisinger C; Hennrich ML; Schram AW; Timmers HT; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
J Proteomics; 2013 Aug; 88():14-26. PubMed ID: 23085607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MS1-based label-free proteomics using a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Shalit T; Elinger D; Savidor A; Gabashvili A; Levin Y
J Proteome Res; 2015 Apr; 14(4):1979-86. PubMed ID: 25780947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. RIBAR and xRIBAR: Methods for reproducible relative MS/MS-based label-free protein quantification.
Colaert N; Gevaert K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul; 10(7):3183-9. PubMed ID: 21604685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation and Improvement of Quantification Accuracy in Isobaric Mass Tag-Based Protein Quantification Experiments.
Ahrné E; Glatter T; Viganò C; Schubert Cv; Nigg EA; Schmidt A
J Proteome Res; 2016 Aug; 15(8):2537-47. PubMed ID: 27345528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple peak detection and label-free quantitation algorithm for chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Aoshima K; Takahashi K; Ikawa M; Kimura T; Fukuda M; Tanaka S; Parry HE; Fujita Y; Yoshizawa AC; Utsunomiya S; Kajihara S; Tanaka K; Oda Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):376. PubMed ID: 25420746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positional proteomics in the era of the human proteome project on the doorstep of precision medicine.
Eckhard U; Marino G; Butler GS; Overall CM
Biochimie; 2016 Mar; 122():110-8. PubMed ID: 26542287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical proteomics-driven precision medicine for targeted cancer therapy: current overview and future perspectives.
Zhou L; Wang K; Li Q; Nice EC; Zhang H; Huang C
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2016; 13(4):367-81. PubMed ID: 26923776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Temporal Proteomic Changes in Signaling Pathways during BV2 Mouse Microglial Cell Activation.
Woo J; Han D; Wang JI; Park J; Kim H; Kim Y
J Proteome Res; 2017 Sep; 16(9):3419-3432. PubMed ID: 28777000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel triplex isobaric termini labeling quantitative approach for simultaneously supplying three quantitative sources.
Jiang H; Yin H; Xie L; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Yang PY; Lu H
Anal Chim Acta; 2018 Feb; 1001():70-77. PubMed ID: 29291808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing Suitability of Cell Cultures for SILAC-Experiments Using SWATH-Mass Spectrometry.
Reinders Y; Völler D; Bosserhoff AK; Oefner PJ; Reinders J
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1394():101-108. PubMed ID: 26700044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers.
Heller M; Mattou H; Menzel C; Yao X
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2003 Jul; 14(7):704-18. PubMed ID: 12837592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of MS2-based label-free quantitative proteomic techniques with regards to accuracy and precision.
Colaert N; Vandekerckhove J; Gevaert K; Martens L
Proteomics; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1110-3. PubMed ID: 21365758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust dimethyl-based multiplex-DIA doubles single-cell proteome depth via a reference channel.
Thielert M; Itang EC; Ammar C; Rosenberger FA; Bludau I; Schweizer L; Nordmann TM; Skowronek P; Wahle M; Zeng WF; Zhou XX; Brunner AD; Richter S; Levesque MP; Theis FJ; Steger M; Mann M
Mol Syst Biol; 2023 Sep; 19(9):e11503. PubMed ID: 37602975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Graph-based peak alignment algorithms for multiple liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry datasets.
Wang J; Lam H
Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 29(19):2469-76. PubMed ID: 23904508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of label-free and label-based strategies for proteome analysis of hepatoma cell lines.
Megger DA; Pott LL; Ahrens M; Padden J; Bracht T; Kuhlmann K; Eisenacher M; Meyer HE; Sitek B
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 May; 1844(5):967-76. PubMed ID: 23954498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
