These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28888731)

  • 21. Hot water flushing for immiscible displacement of a viscous NAPL.
    O'Carroll DM; Sleep BE
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 May; 91(3-4):247-66. PubMed ID: 17207892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fresh underground light non-aqueous liquid (LNAPL) pollution source zone monitoring in an outdoor experiment using cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography.
    Shao S; Guo X; Gao C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(18):18316-18328. PubMed ID: 31041708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Single-well "push-pull" partitioning tracer test for NAPL detection in the subsurface.
    Istok JD; Field JA; Schroth MH; Davis BM; Dwarakanath V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jun; 36(12):2708-16. PubMed ID: 12099468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Non-equilibrium partitioning tracer transport in porous media: 2-D physical modelling and imaging using a partitioning fluorescent dye.
    Jones EH; Smith CC
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5099-111. PubMed ID: 16298415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetic resonance imaging of nonaqueous phase liquid during soil vapor extraction in heterogeneous porous media.
    Chu Y; Werth CJ; Valocchi AJ; Yoon H; Webb AG
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):15-37. PubMed ID: 15336788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two-dimensional laboratory simulation of LNAPL infiltration and redistribution in the vadose zone.
    Kechavarzi C; Soga K; Illangasekare TH
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Feb; 76(3-4):211-33. PubMed ID: 15683881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrical resistivity characteristics of diesel oil-contaminated kaolin clay and a resistivity-based detection method.
    Liu Z; Liu S; Cai Y; Fang W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Jun; 22(11):8216-23. PubMed ID: 25516255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enhanced removal of NAPL constituent from aquifer during surfactant flushing with aqueous hydraulic barriers of high viscosity.
    Ahn D; Choi JK; Kim H
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jun; 52(7):590-597. PubMed ID: 28281884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of Sherwood-Gilland models for NAPL dissolution and their relationship to soil properties.
    Kokkinaki A; O'Carroll DM; Werth CJ; Sleep BE
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Dec; 155():87-98. PubMed ID: 24220700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A constitutive model for air-NAPL-water flow in the vadose zone accounting for immobile, non-occluded (residual) NAPL in strongly water-wet porous media.
    Lenhard RJ; Oostrom M; Dane JH
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Jul; 71(1-4):261-82. PubMed ID: 15145570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A constitutive model for air-NAPL-water flow in the vadose zone accounting for immobile, non-occluded (residual) NAPL in strongly water-wet porous media.
    Lenhard RJ; Oostrom M; Dane JH
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):283-304. PubMed ID: 15614970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visualization of dyed NAPL concentration in transparent porous media using color space components.
    Kashuk S; Mercurio SR; Iskander M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Jul; 162-163():1-16. PubMed ID: 24796514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diffusive partitioning tracer test for the quantification of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) in the vadose zone: performance evaluation for heterogeneous NAPL distribution.
    Werner D; Karapanagioti HK; Höhener P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Aug; 108(1-2):54-63. PubMed ID: 19539397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characterization of pore scale NAPL morphology in homogeneous sands as a function of grain size and NAPL dissolution.
    Cho J; Annable MD
    Chemosphere; 2005 Nov; 61(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 15950262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In-situ determination of field-scale NAPL mass transfer coefficients: Performance, simulation and analysis.
    Mobile M; Widdowson M; Stewart L; Nyman J; Deeb R; Kavanaugh M; Mercer J; Gallagher D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Apr; 187():31-46. PubMed ID: 26855386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating biofuel contaminant concentration from 4D ERT with mixing models.
    Glaser DR; Henderson RD; Werkema DD; Johnson TJ; Versteeg RJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2022 Jun; 248():104027. PubMed ID: 35640423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface.
    Zhu J; Sykes JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Aug; 72(1-4):245-58. PubMed ID: 15240175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation model to predict residual immiscible organic contaminants in sandy soils.
    Chevalier LR; Fonte JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2000 Feb; 72(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 10648947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling of soil gas radon as an in situ partitioning tracer for quantifying LNAPL contamination.
    Cecconi A; Verginelli I; Baciocchi R
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150593. PubMed ID: 34592297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sherwood correlation for dissolution of pooled NAPL in porous media.
    Aydin Sarikurt D; Gokdemir C; Copty NK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Nov; 206():67-74. PubMed ID: 29033219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.