These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28889173)

  • 1. The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 28889173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Novel, Structured Fellow Training Pathway for Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Catanzarite T; Tan-Kim J; Nguyen JN; Jakus-Waldman S; Menefee SA
    Perm J; 2021 May; 25():. PubMed ID: 35348059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does training of fellows affect peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?
    Khene ZE; Peyronnet B; Bosquet E; Pradère B; Robert C; Fardoun T; Kammerer-Jacquet SF; Verhoest G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Mathieu R; Bensalah K
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):591-599. PubMed ID: 28464554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy.
    Evangelopoulos N; Nessi A; Achtari C
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 38340232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of a Dedicated Robotic Team on Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 28430728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.
    Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with hinotori, a brand-new surgical robot system produced in Japan; report of initial clinical case series.
    Ichino M; Sasaki H; Takenaka M; Zennami K; Takahara K; Shiroki R
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Oct; 17(4):e13380. PubMed ID: 39187427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.