BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28890920)

  • 1. How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a 'model system' for incidental finding errors in radiology.
    Wolfe JM; Alaoui Soce A; Schill HM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):35. PubMed ID: 28890920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.
    Nartker MS; Alaoui-Soce A; Wolfe JM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Jul; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 32728864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Manifestation of Incidental Findings in Different Experimental Visual Search Paradigms.
    Rubtsova OS; Gorbunova ES
    Psychol Russ; 2022; 15(4):140-158. PubMed ID: 36761717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.
    Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid visual and memory search for scenes and objects with variable viewpoints.
    Zou B; Huang Z; Alaoui-Soce A; Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2024 Jan; 24(1):5. PubMed ID: 38197740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):5. PubMed ID: 28203633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search.
    Fleck MS; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Nov; 18(11):943-7. PubMed ID: 17958706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.
    Adamo SH; Gereke BJ; Shomstein S; Schmidt J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Aug; 6(1):59. PubMed ID: 34455466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-induced attentional blink: a cause of errors in multiple-target search.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2569-74. PubMed ID: 24142814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):47. PubMed ID: 29214208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colour and spatial cueing in low-prevalence visual search.
    Russell NC; Kunar MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1327-44. PubMed ID: 22493942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple eye-movement feedback during visual search is not helpful.
    Drew T; Williams LH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):44. PubMed ID: 29214205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches.
    Levin DT; Angelone BL; Beck MR
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 21751991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.
    Mitroff SR; Biggs AT
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 24270463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.
    Nako R; Wu R; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 23796065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search?
    Spaethe J; Tautz J; Chittka L
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Mar; 209(Pt 6):987-93. PubMed ID: 16513924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.