These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28890987)

  • 1. Impact of Patient-Specific Inflow Velocity Profile on Hemodynamics of the Thoracic Aorta.
    Youssefi P; Gomez A; Arthurs C; Sharma R; Jahangiri M; Alberto Figueroa C
    J Biomech Eng; 2018 Jan; 140(1):. PubMed ID: 28890987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics-assessment of aortic hemodynamics in a spectrum of aortic valve pathologies.
    Youssefi P; Gomez A; He T; Anderson L; Bunce N; Sharma R; Figueroa CA; Jahangiri M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jan; 153(1):8-20.e3. PubMed ID: 27847162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data-driven generation of 4D velocity profiles in the aneurysmal ascending aorta.
    Saitta S; Maga L; Armour C; Votta E; O'Regan DP; Salmasi MY; Athanasiou T; Weinsaft JW; Xu XY; Pirola S; Redaelli A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107468. PubMed ID: 36921465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamics alteration in patient-specific dilated ascending thoracic aortas with tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.
    Jayendiran R; Campisi S; Viallon M; Croisille P; Avril S
    J Biomech; 2020 Sep; 110():109954. PubMed ID: 32827782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.
    Semaan E; Markl M; Malaisrie SC; Barker A; Allen B; McCarthy P; Carr JC; Collins JD
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):818-25. PubMed ID: 24317086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inflow boundary conditions for image-based computational hemodynamics: impact of idealized versus measured velocity profiles in the human aorta.
    Morbiducci U; Ponzini R; Gallo D; Bignardi C; Rizzo G
    J Biomech; 2013 Jan; 46(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 23159094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-specific assessment of hemodynamics by computational fluid dynamics in patients with bicuspid aortopathy.
    Kimura N; Nakamura M; Komiya K; Nishi S; Yamaguchi A; Tanaka O; Misawa Y; Adachi H; Kawahito K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 153(4):S52-S62.e3. PubMed ID: 28190607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ascending thoracic aorta aneurysm repair induces positive hemodynamic outcomes in a patient with unchanged bicuspid aortic valve.
    Condemi F; Campisi S; Viallon M; Croisille P; Fuzelier JF; Avril S
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():145-148. PubMed ID: 30340762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Subject-Specific, Spatially Reduced, and Idealized Boundary Conditions on the Predicted Hemodynamic Environment in the Murine Aorta.
    Smith KA; Merchant SS; Hsu EW; Timmins LH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3255-3266. PubMed ID: 34528150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of the aortic valve angle on the hemodynamic features of the thoracic aorta.
    Ha H; Kim GB; Kweon J; Lee SJ; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():32316. PubMed ID: 27561388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Dux-Santoy L; Guala A; Kale R; Maldonado G; Teixidó-Turà G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 29695249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
    Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aortic Valve Stenosis Alters Expression of Regional Aortic Wall Shear Stress: New Insights From a 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of 571 Subjects.
    van Ooij P; Markl M; Collins JD; Carr JC; Rigsby C; Bonow RO; Malaisrie SC; McCarthy PM; Fedak PWM; Barker AJ
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 28903936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure drop mapping using 4D flow MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: A novel marker of valvular obstruction.
    Fatehi Hassanabad A; Burns F; Bristow MS; Lydell C; Howarth AG; Heydari B; Gao X; Fedak PWM; White JA; Garcia J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 65():175-182. PubMed ID: 31726212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Normal Variation in the Rotational Position of the Aortic Root on Hemodynamics and Tissue Biomechanics of the Thoracic Aorta.
    Sundström E; Jonnagiri R; Gutmark-Little I; Gutmark E; Critser P; Taylor MD; Tretter JT
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Feb; 11(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 31701357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
    Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thoracic aorta 3D hemodynamics in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
    Allen BD; van Ooij P; Barker AJ; Carr M; Gabbour M; Schnell S; Jarvis KB; Carr JC; Markl M; Rigsby C; Robinson JD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):954-63. PubMed ID: 25644073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.
    Viscardi F; Vergara C; Antiga L; Merelli S; Veneziani A; Puppini G; Faggian G; Mazzucco A; Luciani GB
    Artif Organs; 2010 Dec; 34(12):1114-20. PubMed ID: 20618222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model.
    Nannini G; Caimi A; Palumbo MC; Saitta S; Girardi LN; Gaudino M; Roman MJ; Weinsaft JW; Redaelli A
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104581. PubMed ID: 34174756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.
    Chandra S; Raut SS; Jana A; Biederman RW; Doyle M; Muluk SC; Finol EA
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Aug; 135(8):81001. PubMed ID: 23719760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.