2198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28891217)
1. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robustness of Radiomic Features in [
Lu L; Lv W; Jiang J; Ma J; Feng Q; Rahmim A; Chen W
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Dec; 18(6):935-945. PubMed ID: 27324369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of
Crandall JP; Fraum TJ; Lee M; Jiang L; Grigsby P; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 33008931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of [
Li K; Sun H; Lu Z; Xin J; Zhang L; Guo Y; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():160-166. PubMed ID: 30150039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robustness of [
Palomino-Fernández D; Seiffert AP; Gómez-Grande A; Jiménez López-Guarch C; Moreno G; Bueno H; Gómez EJ; Sánchez-González P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Feb; 244():107981. PubMed ID: 38154326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of tumor segmentation in glioblastoma: Impact on the robustness of MRI-radiomic features.
Tixier F; Um H; Young RJ; Veeraraghavan H
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3582-3591. PubMed ID: 31131906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PET based volume segmentation with emphasis on the iterative TrueX algorithm.
Knäusl B; Hirtl A; Dobrozemsky G; Bergmann H; Kletter K; Dudczak R; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 21251804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Tsujikawa T; Rahman T; Yamamoto M; Yamada S; Tsuyoshi H; Kiyono Y; Kimura H; Yoshida Y; Okazawa H
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):678-685. PubMed ID: 28815452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different segmentation algorithms on metabolic tumor volume measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma.
Xu W; Yu S; Ma Y; Liu C; Xin J
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Mar; 38(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 28118260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.
Fooladi M; Soleymani Y; Rahmim A; Farzanefar S; Aghahosseini F; Seyyedi N; Sh Zadeh P
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111349. PubMed ID: 38310673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) versus filtered back-projection for the assessment of myocardial glucose uptake and myocardial perfusion using dynamic PET.
Søndergaard HM; Madsen MM; Boisen K; Bøttcher M; Schmitz O; Nielsen TT; Bøtker HE; Hansen SB
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 17033850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels.
Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M; Zhang GG; Latifi K; Ullah G; Hunt DC; Balagurunathan Y; Abdalah MA; Schabath MB; Goldgof DG; Mackin D; Court LE; Gillies RJ; Moros EG
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 28112418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of acquisition count statistics reduction and SUV discretization on PET radiomic features in pediatric 18F-FDG-PET/MRI examinations.
Branchini M; Zorz A; Zucchetta P; Bettinelli A; De Monte F; Cecchin D; Paiusco M
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():117-126. PubMed ID: 30928060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [
Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parameters Influencing PET Imaging Features: A Phantom Study with Irregular and Heterogeneous Synthetic Lesions.
Gallivanone F; Interlenghi M; D'Ambrosio D; Trifirò G; Castiglioni I
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():5324517. PubMed ID: 30275800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
