BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28892157)

  • 1. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The state of a central inhibition system predicts access to visual targets: An ERP study on distractor-induced blindness (DIB).
    Niedeggen M; Busch NA; Winther GN
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():308-18. PubMed ID: 25724342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():181-194. PubMed ID: 33279811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
    Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Closing the gates to consciousness: distractors activate a central inhibition process.
    Niedeggen M; Michael L; Hesselmann G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 24(6):1294-304. PubMed ID: 22185492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
    Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness.
    Hesselmann G; Niedeggen M; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1048-56. PubMed ID: 16309728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probing the prerequisites for motion blindness.
    Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M; Blakemore C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 May; 16(4):584-97. PubMed ID: 15165349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open and closed cortico-subcortical loops: A neuro-computational account of access to consciousness in the distractor-induced blindness paradigm.
    Ebner C; Schroll H; Winther G; Niedeggen M; Hamker FH
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():295-307. PubMed ID: 25802010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.