BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28893608)

  • 1. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
    Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
    Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic evaluation of source reconstruction of resting MEG of the human brain with a new high-resolution atlas: Performance, precision, and parcellation.
    Tait L; Özkan A; Szul MJ; Zhang J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(14):4685-4707. PubMed ID: 34219311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. fMRI-EEG integrated cortical source imaging by use of time-variant spatial constraints.
    Liu Z; He B
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1198-214. PubMed ID: 18036833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures.
    Palva JM; Wang SH; Palva S; Zhigalov A; Monto S; Brookes MJ; Schoffelen JM; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():632-643. PubMed ID: 29477441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
    Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing MEG and high-density EEG for intrinsic functional connectivity mapping.
    Coquelet N; De Tiège X; Destoky F; Roshchupkina L; Bourguignon M; Goldman S; Peigneux P; Wens V
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116556. PubMed ID: 31972279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An extensive assessment of network alignment algorithms for comparison of brain connectomes.
    Milano M; Guzzi PH; Tymofieva O; Xu D; Hess C; Veltri P; Cannataro M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 18(Suppl 6):235. PubMed ID: 28617222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate reconstruction of functional networks from cortical sources dynamics in MEG/EEG.
    Dossevi A; Cosmelli D; Garnero L; Ammari H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Aug; 55(8):2074-86. PubMed ID: 18632370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode.
    Maldjian JA; Davenport EM; Whitlow CT
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():88-94. PubMed ID: 24699016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.