206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28894197)
1. A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter Calculations.
Joint Head and Neck Radiotherapy-MRI Development Cooperative
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11185. PubMed ID: 28894197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with maxillofacial tumors.
Kitamoto E; Chikui T; Kawano S; Ohga M; Kobayashi K; Matsuo Y; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Honda H; Yoshiura K
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 25442795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis parameters identify multiple associations between DWI and DCE MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Meyer HJ; Leifels L; Schob S; Garnov N; Surov A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45():72-77. PubMed ID: 28963049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data.
Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DCE-MRI of locally-advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Tofts analysis versus non-model-based analyses.
Lund KV; Simonsen TG; Kristensen GB; Rofstad EK
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 32293487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of liver fibrosis using pharmacokinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Li Z; Sun J; Chen L; Huang N; Hu P; Hu X; Han G; Zhou Y; Bai W; Niu T; Yang X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 26707910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histogram analysis of quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters on DCE-MRI: correlations with prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer.
Nagasaka K; Satake H; Ishigaki S; Kawai H; Naganawa S
Breast Cancer; 2019 Jan; 26(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 30069785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head and neck cancer: Are pharmacokinetic parameters affected?
Panek R; Schmidt MA; Borri M; Koh DM; Riddell A; Welsh L; Dunlop A; Powell C; Bhide SA; Nutting CM; Harrington KJ; Newbold KL; Leach MO
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6024. PubMed ID: 27806585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of DCE-MRI kinetic parameters and FMISO-PET uptake parameters in head and neck cancer patients.
Simoncic U; Leibfarth S; Welz S; Schwenzer N; Schmidt H; Reischl G; Pfannenberg C; Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Zips D; Thorwarth D
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2358-2368. PubMed ID: 28317128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. R2* Relaxation Affects Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Cancer and Underestimates Treatment Response at 7 T.
Kim J; Moestue SA; Bathen TF; Kim E
Tomography; 2019 Sep; 5(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 31572792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of IAUGC indices and two DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters assessed by two different theoretical algorithms in patients with brain tumors.
Bergamino M; Barletta L; Castellan L; Saitta L; Mancardi GL; Roccatagliata L
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(6):808-14. PubMed ID: 25115335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended graphical model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Chen H; Li F; Zhao X; Yuan C; Rutt B; Kerwin WS
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):868-78. PubMed ID: 21394770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vessel wall and adventitial DCE-MRI parameters demonstrate similar correlations with carotid plaque microvasculature on histology.
van Hoof RHM; Vöö SA; Sluimer JC; Wijnen NJA; Hermeling E; Schreuder FHBM; Truijman MTB; Cleutjens JPM; Daemen MJAP; Daemen JH; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Mess WH; Wildberger JE; Heeneman S; Kooi ME
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1053-1059. PubMed ID: 28152245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.
Zhang J; Freed M; Winters K; Kim SG
MAGMA; 2015 Dec; 28(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 26239630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perfusion-sensitive parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in rectal cancer: evaluation of reproducibility and correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Yang X; Xiao X; Lu B; Chen Y; Wen Z; Yu S
Acta Radiol; 2019 May; 60(5):569-577. PubMed ID: 30114928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Different Measurement Methods of Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer.
Dong W; Volk A; Djaroum M; Girot C; Balleyguier C; Lebon V; Garcia G; Ammari S; Temam S; Gorphe P; Wei L; Pitre-Champagnat S; Lassau N; Bidault F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 58(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 36269053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of flip angle uncertainty and noise on the accuracy of DCE-MRI metrics: comparison between standard concentration-based and signal difference methods.
Wang P; Xue Y; Zhao X; Yu J; Rosen M; Song HK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 33(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 25311569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
