2428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28895220)
41. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Use of nutritional warning labels at the point of purchase: An exploratory study using self-reported measures and eye-tracking.
Machín L; Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Giménez A; Curutchet MR; Ares G
Appetite; 2023 Sep; 188():106634. PubMed ID: 37356578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers' motives in food choice.
Vyth EL; Steenhuis IH; Vlot JA; Wulp A; Hogenes MG; Looije DH; Brug J; Seidell JC
Public Health Nutr; 2010 Nov; 13(11):1882-9. PubMed ID: 20359378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of front-of-pack 'traffic-light' nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK.
Sacks G; Rayner M; Swinburn B
Health Promot Int; 2009 Dec; 24(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 19815614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparing five front-of-pack nutrition labels' influence on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions.
Gorski Findling MT; Werth PM; Musicus AA; Bragg MA; Graham DJ; Elbel B; Roberto CA
Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 29066375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A randomized controlled trial examining consumers' perceptions and opinions on using different versions of a FoodFlip© smartphone application for delivery of nutrition information.
Ahmed M; Oh A; Vanderlee L; Franco-Arellano B; Schermel A; Lou W; L'Abbé MR
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Feb; 17(1):22. PubMed ID: 32050996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Online Consumer Survey Comparing Different Front-of-Pack Labels in Greece.
Kontopoulou L; Karpetas G; Fradelos ΕC; Papathanasiou IV; Malli F; Papagiannis D; Mantzaris D; Fialon M; Julia C; Gourgoulianis KI
Nutrients; 2021 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 35010921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket testing the effects of front-of-pack nutrition labelling on food purchasing intentions in a low-income population.
Egnell M; Boutron I; Péneau S; Ducrot P; Touvier M; Galan P; Buscail C; Porcher R; Ravaud P; Hercberg S; Kesse-Guyot E; Julia C
BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e041196. PubMed ID: 33558350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment.
Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():55-62. PubMed ID: 29102533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.
Gómez-Donoso C; Sacks G; Vanderlee L; Hammond D; White CM; Nieto C; Bes-Rastrollo M; Cameron AJ
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Jun; 18(1):78. PubMed ID: 34127002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A nudge in a healthy direction. The effect of nutrition labels on food purchasing behaviors in university dining facilities.
Cioffi CE; Levitsky DA; Pacanowski CR; Bertz F
Appetite; 2015 Sep; 92():7-14. PubMed ID: 25913685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The impact of the nutri-score on food choice: A choice experiment in a Dutch supermarket.
van den Akker K; Bartelet D; Brouwer L; Luijpers S; Nap T; Havermans R
Appetite; 2022 Jan; 168():105664. PubMed ID: 34453996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
Withall E; Wilson AM; Henderson J; Tonkin E; Coveney J; Meyer SB; Clark J; McCullum D; Ankeny R; Ward PR
BMC Public Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):1241. PubMed ID: 27938403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Associations between Governmental Policies to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Purchases and Individual, Retailer, and Community Health Outcomes: An Integrative Review.
Moran AJ; Gu Y; Clynes S; Goheer A; Roberto CA; Palmer A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33076280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers.
Hersey JC; Wohlgenant KC; Arsenault JE; Kosa KM; Muth MK
Nutr Rev; 2013 Jan; 71(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23282247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can unhealthy food purchases at checkout counters be discouraged by introducing healthier snacks? A real-life experiment in supermarkets in deprived urban areas in the Netherlands.
Huitink M; Poelman MP; Seidell JC; Pleus M; Hofkamp T; Kuin C; Dijkstra SC
BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):542. PubMed ID: 32316936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Healthy choice architecture in the supermarket: Does it work?
Thorndike AN
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 266():113459. PubMed ID: 33127172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Food purchasing behaviour of shoppers from different South African socio-economic communities: results from grocery receipts, intercept surveys and in-supermarkets audits.
Odunitan-Wayas FA; Okop KJ; Dover RV; Alaba OA; Micklesfield LK; Puoane T; Levitt NS; Battersby J; Meltzer ST; Lambert EV
Public Health Nutr; 2020 Jul; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 32611454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Effects of a Supermarket-Based Intervention on the Nutritional Quality of Private-Label Foods: A Prospective Study.
Coyle DH; Wu JH; Di Tanna GL; Shahid M; Taylor F; Neal B; Trevena H
Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32517118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
