These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28895452)

  • 1. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.
    Chan MS; Jones CR; Hall Jamieson K; Albarracín D
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1531-1546. PubMed ID: 28895452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The differential effects of a governmental debunking campaign concerning COVID-19 vaccination misinformation.
    Helfers A; Ebersbach M
    J Commun Healthc; 2023 Mar; 16(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 36919806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
    Mourali M; Drake C
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to debunk misinformation? An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats.
    Kotz J; Giese H; König LM
    Br J Health Psychol; 2023 Nov; 28(4):1097-1112. PubMed ID: 37263771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a template for countering misinformation-Real-world Autism treatment myth debunking.
    Paynter J; Luskin-Saxby S; Keen D; Fordyce K; Frost G; Imms C; Miller S; Trembath D; Tucker M; Ecker U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210746. PubMed ID: 30699155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Debunking highly prevalent health misinformation using audio dramas delivered by WhatsApp: evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Sierra Leone.
    Winters M; Oppenheim B; Sengeh P; Jalloh MB; Webber N; Pratt SA; Leigh B; Molsted-Alvesson H; Zeebari Z; Sundberg CJ; Jalloh MF; Nordenstedt H
    BMJ Glob Health; 2021 Nov; 6(11):. PubMed ID: 34758970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promoting COVID-19 vaccine confidence through public responses to misinformation: The joint influence of message source and message content.
    Wood RM; Juanchich M; Ramirez M; Zhang S
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 May; 324():115863. PubMed ID: 37030097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication.
    Kessler SH; Bachmann E
    Z Gesundh Wiss; 2022; 30(8):1823-1835. PubMed ID: 35070640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Debunking of Misinformation Does and Doesn't.
    Jang JW; Lee EJ; Shin SY
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Jun; 22(6):423-427. PubMed ID: 31135182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public sector's misinformation debunking during the public health campaign: a case of Hong Kong.
    Zhu R; Zhang X
    Health Promot Int; 2023 Jun; 38(3):. PubMed ID: 37279470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refuting misinformation: Examining theoretical underpinnings of refutational interventions.
    Amazeen MA; Krishna A
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101774. PubMed ID: 38101246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.
    Lewandowsky S; Ecker UK; Seifert CM; Schwarz N; Cook J
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2012 Dec; 13(3):106-31. PubMed ID: 26173286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial.
    Yousuf H; van der Linden S; Bredius L; Ted van Essen GA; Sweep G; Preminger Z; van Gorp E; Scherder E; Narula J; Hofstra L
    EClinicalMedicine; 2021 May; 35():100881. PubMed ID: 34124631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective mitigation of the belief perseverance bias after the retraction of misinformation: Awareness training and counter-speech.
    Siebert J; Siebert JU
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282202. PubMed ID: 36888583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective correction of misinformation.
    Prike T; Ecker UKH
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2023 Dec; 54():101712. PubMed ID: 37944323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.
    Tay LQ; Hurlstone MJ; Kurz T; Ecker UKH
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):591-607. PubMed ID: 34967004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the effects of simple and refutational narratives in misinformation correction: The moderating roles of correction placement and issue involvement.
    Wang W; Huang Y
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Nov; 32(8):985-1002. PubMed ID: 37194942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Medical misinformation on social media: should it be corrected or not?].
    Pleijter ARJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2022 Dec; 166():. PubMed ID: 36633086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.