These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28895467)

  • 1. Kinetic and kinematic patterns during high intensity clean movement: searching for optimal load.
    Ammar A; Riemann BL; Masmoudi L; Blaumann M; Abdelkarim O; Hökelmann A
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Jun; 36(12):1319-1330. PubMed ID: 28895467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Redistributing load using wearable resistance during power clean training improves athletic performance.
    Marriner CR; Cronin JB; Macadam P; Storey A
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Oct; 17(9):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 28792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Jones PA; Udall R
    Sports Biomech; 2015 Jun; 14(2):139-56. PubMed ID: 25896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of optimal loading during the power clean, in collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; Fletcher C; McMahon JJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Nov; 26(11):2970-4. PubMed ID: 22190161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.
    Suchomel TJ; Wright GA; Kernozek TW; Kline DE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Feb; 28(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 23689341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of loading on kinematic and kinetic variables during the midthigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Udall R; Jones PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22516901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of 2- vs. 3-Minute Interrepetition Rest Period on Maximal Clean Technique and Performance.
    Ammar A; Riemann BL; Abdelkarim O; Driss T; Hökelmann A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Sep; 34(9):2548-2556. PubMed ID: 30138239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of peak ground reaction force and rate of force development during variations of the power clean.
    Comfort P; Allen M; Graham-Smith P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 May; 25(5):1235-9. PubMed ID: 21522071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinetic comparisons during variations of the power clean.
    Comfort P; Allen M; Graham-Smith P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Dec; 25(12):3269-73. PubMed ID: 22080325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No kinetic differences during variations of the power clean in inexperienced female collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; McMahon JJ; Fletcher C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Feb; 27(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 22465991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of load positioning on the kinematics and kinetics of weighted vertical jumps.
    Swinton PA; Stewart AD; Lloyd R; Agouris I; Keogh JW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Apr; 26(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 22446664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 2- and 3-Minute Inter-Repetition Rest Periods on Maximal Jerk Technique and Power Maintenance.
    Ammar A; Riemann BL; Trabelsi K; Blaumann M; Abdelkarim O; Chtourou H; Driss T; Hökelmann A
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Sep; 90(3):287-296. PubMed ID: 30990367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of load on lower body performance variables during the hang power clean.
    Suchomel TJ; Beckham GK; Wright GA
    Sports Biomech; 2014 Mar; 13(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 24968513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement of Kinetic, Kinematic, and Qualitative Performance Variables of the Power Clean With the Hook Grip.
    Oranchuk DJ; Drinkwater EJ; Lindsay RS; Helms ER; Harbour ET; Storey AG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Mar; 14(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 30204518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of maximal velocity deadlifts performed with and without the inclusion of chain resistance.
    Swinton PA; Stewart AD; Keogh JW; Agouris I; Lloyd R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Nov; 25(11):3163-74. PubMed ID: 21993040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of various loads on the force-time characteristics of the hang high pull.
    Suchomel TJ; Beckham GK; Wright GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 May; 29(5):1295-301. PubMed ID: 25426514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral power snatch lifts.
    Lauder MA; Lake JP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):653-60. PubMed ID: 18438258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the snatch technique for lifting different barbell weights.
    Hadi G; Akkuş H; Harbili E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1568-76. PubMed ID: 22614145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.
    Storey A; Smith HK
    Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 42(9):769-90. PubMed ID: 22873835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peak power, ground reaction forces, and velocity during the squat exercise performed at different loads.
    Zink AJ; Perry AC; Robertson BL; Roach KE; Signorile JF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2006 Aug; 20(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 16937981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.