These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28898399)

  • 1. Bias-corrected estimation of the Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay mixture index of fit.
    Reiczigel J; Ispány M; Tusnády G; Michaletzky G; Marozzi M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):459-471. PubMed ID: 28898399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rater agreement and the generalized Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay index of fit.
    Formann AK
    Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(14):1881-8. PubMed ID: 10867677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications and computational strategies for the two-point mixture index of fit.
    Dayton CM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12812155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the Rasch model by means of the mixture fit index.
    Formann AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):89-95. PubMed ID: 16779897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysing model fit of psychometric process models: An overview, a new test and an application to the diffusion model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):209-224. PubMed ID: 28474770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latent class model diagnosis from a frequentist point of view.
    Formann AK
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):189-96; discussion 197-8. PubMed ID: 12762457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.
    Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Goodness-of-fit test for a parametric mixture cure model with partly interval-censored data.
    Geng Z; Li J; Niu Y; Wang X
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):407-421. PubMed ID: 36477899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymptotically Correct Standardization of Person-Fit Statistics Beyond Dichotomous Items.
    Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):992-1013. PubMed ID: 25953476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequentist Model Averaging in Structural Equation Modelling.
    Jin S; Ankargren S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 29869128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Infinitesimal Jackknife and Moment Structure Analysis Using Higher Order Moments.
    Jennrich R; Satorra A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 25361618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The choice of the ability estimate with asymptotically correct standardized person-fit statistics.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 27062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An asymptotic approximation to the N-mixture model for the estimation of disease prevalence.
    Brintz B; Fuentes C; Madsen L
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1512-1518. PubMed ID: 29870071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.
    Cheng Y; Gao D; Tong T
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):189-204. PubMed ID: 24963010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive design: estimation and inference with censored data in a semiparametric model.
    Shen Y; Cheng Y
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 16787996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.