These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

762 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28898917)

  • 1. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.
    Pouw RE; Barret M; Biermann K; Bisschops R; Czakó L; Gecse KB; de Hertogh G; Hucl T; Iacucci M; Jansen M; Rutter M; Savarino E; Spaander MCW; Schmidt PT; Vieth M; Dinis-Ribeiro M; van Hooft JE
    Endoscopy; 2021 Nov; 53(11):1174-1188. PubMed ID: 34535035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017.
    Dumonceau JM; Deprez PH; Jenssen C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Larghi A; Vanbiervliet G; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono PG; Bastos P; Carrara S; Czakó L; Fernández-Esparrach G; Fockens P; Ginès À; Havre RF; Hassan C; Vilmann P; van Hooft JE; Polkowski M
    Endoscopy; 2017 Jul; 49(7):695-714. PubMed ID: 28511234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
    Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.
    Deprez PH; Moons LMG; OʼToole D; Gincul R; Seicean A; Pimentel-Nunes P; Fernández-Esparrach G; Polkowski M; Vieth M; Borbath I; Moreels TG; Nieveen van Dijkum E; Blay JY; van Hooft JE
    Endoscopy; 2022 Apr; 54(4):412-429. PubMed ID: 35180797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.
    Soltani AK; Krishnan K
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 32680792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
    Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
    Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
    Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.