185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28899713)
1. Interrater reliability of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).
Vishnevetsky J; Walters CB; Tan KS
Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):490-496. PubMed ID: 28899713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information.
Shoemaker SJ; Wolf MS; Brach C
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Sep; 96(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 24973195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).
Furukawa E; Okuhara T; Okada H; Shirabe R; Yokota R; Iye R; Kiuchi T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.
O'Reilly OC; Skalitzky MK; Kesler KK; Shamrock AG; Gao B; Gulbrandsen TR; Bollier MJ
Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 38919367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understandability, actionability, and readability of online patient education materials about diabetes mellitus.
Lipari M; Berlie H; Saleh Y; Hang P; Moser L
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jan; 76(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 31408087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.
Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM
Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What's in Between the Lines: Assessing the Readability, Understandability, and Actionability in Breast Cancer Survivorship Print Materials.
Parker PD; Prabhu AV; Su LJ; Zorn KK; Greene CJ; Hadden KB; McSweeney JC
J Cancer Educ; 2022 Oct; 37(5):1532-1539. PubMed ID: 33822316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the Understandability and Actionability of Online Neurosurgical Patient Education Materials.
Lopez Ramos C; Williams JE; Bababekov YJ; Chang DC; Carter BS; Jones PS
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e588-e597. PubMed ID: 31260846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are Online Zenker's Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable?
Balakrishnan V; Chandy Z; Verma SP
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Nov; 155(5):758-763. PubMed ID: 27329416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.
Harris VC; Links AR; Hong P; Walsh J; Schoo DP; Tunkel DE; Stewart CM; Boss EF
Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 28842989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?
Gao B; Skalitzky MK; Rund J; Shamrock AG; Gulbrandsen TR; Buckwalter J
Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 38919356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.
Balakrishnan V; Chandy Z; Hseih A; Bui TL; Verma SP
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 154(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 26861227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient education materials assessment tool for laryngectomy health information.
Wong K; Gilad A; Cohen MB; Kirke DN; Jalisi SM
Head Neck; 2017 Nov; 39(11):2256-2263. PubMed ID: 28815835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing of the audiovisual patient educational materials on diabetes care with PEMAT.
Kang SJ; Lee MS
Public Health Nurs; 2019 May; 36(3):379-387. PubMed ID: 30600545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Effective Are Patient Education Materials in Educating Patients?
Keçeci A; Toprak S; Kiliç S
Clin Nurs Res; 2019 Jun; 28(5):567-582. PubMed ID: 29103313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients.
Bonner C; Patel P; Fajardo MA; Zhuang R; Trevena L
BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e025173. PubMed ID: 30872547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating co-created patient-facing materials to increase understanding of genetic test results.
Dwyer AA; Au MG; Smith N; Plummer L; Lippincott MF; Balasubramanian R; Seminara SB
J Genet Couns; 2021 Apr; 30(2):598-605. PubMed ID: 33098367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health literacy in rotator cuff repair: a quantitative assessment of the understandability of online patient education material.
Gulbrandsen MT; O'Reilly OC; Gao B; Cannon D; Jesurajan J; Gulbrandsen TR; Phipatanakul WP
JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2344-2348. PubMed ID: 37969518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of an organisation-wide health literacy approach to improve the understandability and actionability of patient information and education materials: A pre-post effectiveness study.
Mastroianni F; Chen YC; Vellar L; Cvejic E; Smith JK; McCaffery KJ; Muscat DM
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Sep; 102(9):1656-1661. PubMed ID: 30962076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
