156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28899943)
41. Multiple domains in Siz SUMO ligases contribute to substrate selectivity.
Reindle A; Belichenko I; Bylebyl GR; Chen XL; Gandhi N; Johnson ES
J Cell Sci; 2006 Nov; 119(Pt 22):4749-57. PubMed ID: 17077124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Isw2 chromatin-remodeling ATPase cooperates with the Fkh2 transcription factor to repress transcription of the B-type cyclin gene CLB2.
Sherriff JA; Kent NA; Mellor J
Mol Cell Biol; 2007 Apr; 27(8):2848-60. PubMed ID: 17283050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. SUMO Pathway Modulation of Regulatory Protein Binding at the Ribosomal DNA Locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Gillies J; Hickey CM; Su D; Wu Z; Peng J; Hochstrasser M
Genetics; 2016 Apr; 202(4):1377-94. PubMed ID: 26837752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Noncovalent modification of chromatin: different remodeled products with different ATPase domains.
Fan HY; Narlikar GJ; Kingston RE
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2004; 69():183-92. PubMed ID: 16117648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Functional role of extranucleosomal DNA and the entry site of the nucleosome in chromatin remodeling by ISW2.
Zofall M; Persinger J; Bartholomew B
Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Nov; 24(22):10047-57. PubMed ID: 15509805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The DNA-binding domain of the Chd1 chromatin-remodelling enzyme contains SANT and SLIDE domains.
Ryan DP; Sundaramoorthy R; Martin D; Singh V; Owen-Hughes T
EMBO J; 2011 May; 30(13):2596-609. PubMed ID: 21623345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS3 results in Gcn4p-dependent, SWI/SNF-dependent mobilization of nucleosomes over the entire gene.
Kim Y; McLaughlin N; Lindstrom K; Tsukiyama T; Clark DJ
Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Nov; 26(22):8607-22. PubMed ID: 16982689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. INO80 subfamily of chromatin remodeling complexes.
Bao Y; Shen X
Mutat Res; 2007 May; 618(1-2):18-29. PubMed ID: 17316710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Regulated displacement of TBP from the PHO8 promoter in vivo requires Cbf1 and the Isw1 chromatin remodeling complex.
Moreau JL; Lee M; Mahachi N; Vary J; Mellor J; Tsukiyama T; Goding CR
Mol Cell; 2003 Jun; 11(6):1609-20. PubMed ID: 12820973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A mammalian chromatin remodeling complex with similarities to the yeast INO80 complex.
Jin J; Cai Y; Yao T; Gottschalk AJ; Florens L; Swanson SK; Gutiérrez JL; Coleman MK; Workman JL; Mushegian A; Washburn MP; Conaway RC; Conaway JW
J Biol Chem; 2005 Dec; 280(50):41207-12. PubMed ID: 16230350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in transcription, replication and repair.
Conaway RC; Conaway JW
Trends Biochem Sci; 2009 Feb; 34(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 19062292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Gal4-VP16 directs ATP-independent chromatin reorganization in a yeast chromatin assembly system.
Robinson KM; Schultz MC
Biochemistry; 2005 Mar; 44(11):4551-61. PubMed ID: 15766286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. PHD domain-mediated E3 ligase activity directs intramolecular sumoylation of an adjacent bromodomain required for gene silencing.
Ivanov AV; Peng H; Yurchenko V; Yap KL; Negorev DG; Schultz DC; Psulkowski E; Fredericks WJ; White DE; Maul GG; Sadofsky MJ; Zhou MM; Rauscher FJ
Mol Cell; 2007 Dec; 28(5):823-37. PubMed ID: 18082607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. SIM-dependent enhancement of substrate-specific SUMOylation by a ubiquitin ligase in vitro.
Parker JL; Ulrich HD
Biochem J; 2014 Feb; 457(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 24224485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. In Vitro Studies Reveal a Sequential Mode of Chain Processing by the Yeast SUMO (Small Ubiquitin-related Modifier)-specific Protease Ulp2.
Eckhoff J; Dohmen RJ
J Biol Chem; 2015 May; 290(19):12268-81. PubMed ID: 25833950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Slx5/Slx8-dependent ubiquitin hotspots on chromatin contribute to stress tolerance.
Höpfler M; Kern MJ; Straub T; Prytuliak R; Habermann BH; Pfander B; Jentsch S
EMBO J; 2019 Jun; 38(11):. PubMed ID: 31015336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks.
Shim EY; Ma JL; Oum JH; Yanez Y; Lee SE
Mol Cell Biol; 2005 May; 25(10):3934-44. PubMed ID: 15870268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. S. cerevisiae Mre11 recruits conjugated SUMO moieties to facilitate the assembly and function of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex.
Chen YJ; Chuang YC; Chuang CN; Cheng YH; Chang CR; Leng CH; Wang TF
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Mar; 44(5):2199-213. PubMed ID: 26743002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Regulation of Ku-DNA association by Yku70 C-terminal tail and SUMO modification.
Hang LE; Lopez CR; Liu X; Williams JM; Chung I; Wei L; Bertuch AA; Zhao X
J Biol Chem; 2014 Apr; 289(15):10308-10317. PubMed ID: 24567323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Regulation of Mec1 kinase activity by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex.
Kapoor P; Bao Y; Xiao J; Luo J; Shen J; Persinger J; Peng G; Ranish J; Bartholomew B; Shen X
Genes Dev; 2015 Mar; 29(6):591-602. PubMed ID: 25792597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
